I am trying to get an expresion of \begin{equation*} \nabla^2(f(r)\mathbf{r}), \end{equation*} where $\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{r}(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ and $|\mathbf{r}| = r$, using index notation. For example \begin{align*} \nabla^2f(r) &= \nabla\cdot\nabla f(r) \\ &= (\mathbf{e}_i\cdot\mathbf{e}_j)\partial_i(\partial_j(f(r))) \\ &= \delta_{ij}\partial_i(\partial_jf(r)) \\ &= \partial_i\partial_if(r) \\ &= \partial_1^2f(r) + \partial_2^2f(r) + \partial_3^2f(r). \end{align*} But I have not been able to it, because I don't know how continue from here \begin{align*} \nabla^2(f(r)\mathbf{r}) &= \nabla\cdot\nabla(f(r)\mathbf{r}) \\ &= \mathbf{e}_i\partial_i\cdot(\mathbf{e}_j\partial_j(\mathbf{e}_k f(r)r_k)). \qquad\longleftarrow\textbf{Here} \end{align*} I know it is a tensor, but, what is the notation for: $\mathbf{e}_i\mathbf{e}_j$.
2026-03-26 14:30:26.1774535426
How can I express $\nabla^2(f(r)\mathbf{r})$ with index notation?
607 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MULTIVARIABLE-CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- $\iint_{S} F.\eta dA$ where $F = [3x^2 , y^2 , 0]$ and $S : r(u,v) = [u,v,2u+3v]$
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- Prove all tangent plane to the cone $x^2+y^2=z^2$ goes through the origin
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Find the directional derivative in the point $p$ in the direction $\vec{pp'}$
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Define in which points function is continuous
Related Questions in LAPLACIAN
- Polar Brownian motion not recovering polar Laplacian?
- Trivial demonstration. $\nabla J(r,t)=\frac{\hbar}{im}\nabla\psi^{*}\nabla\psi+\frac{\hbar}{im}\psi\nabla^2\psi$
- Bochner nonnegativity theorem for Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions?
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Integral of the Laplacian of a function that is constant on the sphere
- Trying to show 9 point laplacian equivalence
- Does the laplacian operator work on time as well as spacial variables?
- Find the Green's function $G(\mathbf{x},\xi)$, such that $\nabla^2G = \delta(\mathbf{x}-\xi)$
- Laplace-Beltrami operator in $\mathbb{R}^m$
- demonstration of vector laplacian in cartesian coordinates
Related Questions in INDEX-NOTATION
- Index notation for vector calculus proof
- How does one deal with modulus in index notation?
- Summing up discrete probabilities - trivial?
- Levi-Civita tensor contraction contradiction
- Show that using Suffix Notation
- Show with index notation that $||\nabla \times \underline{u}||^2=||\nabla \underline{u}||^2 - \mathbf{Tr}[(\nabla \underline{u})^2]$
- When would $\underline{\nabla} \cdot \underline{F} = 0$?
- Fluid Dynamics Proof
- Difference between $T^{i}_{\;\;j}$ and $T_i^{\;\;j}$?
- Notation - the element with the maximum value in a different set
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Before we do any detailed calculations, let's see roughly what to expect.
Write $\nabla^2=\partial_i\partial_i$. Your expression is$$\partial_i\partial_i(f(r)r_j\mathbf{e}_j)=\left([\partial_i\partial_i f(r)]r_j+2\partial_if\partial_ir_j+f(r)\partial_i\partial_ir_j\right)\mathbf{e}_j.$$Since $\partial_ir_j=\delta_{ij}$, the above simplifies to $\left([\partial_i\partial_i f(r)]r_j+2\partial_jf\right)\mathbf{e}_j$. But$$\partial_kf(r)=\frac{1}{2r}f^\prime(r)\partial_k(r^2)=\frac{1}{2r}f^\prime(r)\partial_k(r_lr_l)=\frac{r_kf^\prime}{r},$$and so (we'll need this special case in a moment)$$\partial_i\frac1r=-\frac{r_i}{r^3}.$$So we can simplify again to$$\left([\partial_i(r_i f^\prime/r)]r_j+2r_jf^\prime/r\right)\mathbf{e}_j=(4f^\prime/r+f^{\prime\prime})r_j\mathbf{e}_j=(4f^\prime/r+f^{\prime\prime})\mathbf{r}.$$I've cancelled/collected many terms, but I recommend you write out all the details yourself. Note the $2$ became $4$; in $d$ dimensions, it would be $d+1$.