I have a picture of a rectangle which looks like a trapezium due to my photo angle. I know the width of this rectangle which is 55 cm. Is there any way I can find the length of it considering where the point the picture is taken?
2026-03-26 14:34:23.1774535663
How can I figure out the length of a rectangle when I know the width of it
106 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in RECTANGLES
- Three touching circles inscribed in a rectangle
- How to find a rectangle's rotation amount that is inscribed inside an axis-aligned rectangle?
- Maximum Area of inscribed rectangle
- Convergence of ratio of two sums of uniform random variables
- 2 rectangles and 1 square
- Merging overlapping axis-aligned rectangles
- Integrating the area of a circle with rectangles
- How to prove that a complex function is not analytic in a rectangle?
- Determinate the shaded area of the rectangle divided in 4 triangles
- Can the squares with side $1/n$ be packed into a $1 \times \zeta(2)$ rectangle?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Interesting problem.
It has a negative answer, which seems unfortunate, but the answer is mathematically interesting.
Consider all rectangles of width 55 (I'll suppress the units of centimeters). They can have arbitrary length. Choosing any two lengths $s,t$, your question can be reworded: Is it possible for an $s \times 55$ rectangle and a $t \times 55$ rectangle to appear the same in a photograph?
To translate this into mathematics, we use projective geometry. Consider two rectangles $S,T$ in Euclidean 3-space $\mathbb{R}^3$. Let $S_1,T_1$ be congruent rectanges in the Euclidean plane $\mathbb{R}^2$. Then take the usual injection of $\mathbb{R}^2$ into the real projective plane $\mathbb{R}P^2$. We can ask: are $S_1,T_1$ projectively equivalent? What this means is that that there is a projective transformation $f : \mathbb{R}P^2 \to \mathbb{R}P^2$ such that $f(S_1)=T_1$.
The key fact needed (discovered by Renaissance artists, and translated into modern language) is that $S,T$ "can appear the same in a photograph" if and only if $S_1,T_1$ are projectively equivalent.
So, if $S_1 = [0,s] \times [0,55]$ and $T_1 = [0,t] \times [0,55]$, does there exist a projective transformation taking $S_1$ to $T_1$? And the answer is "yes", because the transformation that multiplies the horizontal coordinate by $t/s$ and leaves the vertical coordinate unchanged is a projective transformation.