How can I prove that the Sorgenfrey line is a Lindelöf space? Now, Sorgenfrey line is $\mathbb{R}$ with the basis of $\{[a,b) \mid a,b\in\mathbb{R}, a<b\}$, and in general, a topological space is called a "Lindelöf space" iff every open cover has a countable subcover. Please show me an elegant proof.
2026-02-23 05:14:25.1771823665
How can I prove that the Sorgenfrey line is a Lindelöf space?
3.9k Views Asked by user115322 https://math.techqa.club/user/user115322/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in SORGENFREY-LINE
- Disconnectedness of closed intervals in Sorgenfrey's line
- One-Sided Notion of Topological Closure
- Connected topologies on $\mathbb{R}$ strictly between the usual topology and the lower-limit topology
- Lower limit topology and empty set
- $\mathscr{B} = \{ [a, b) | a< b \in \mathbb{R} \}$ is a basis for a Topology in $\mathbb{R}$
- Compact sets through topologies over a set
- How to show $R_l$ is Lindelöf space?
- Topology Munkres ($2^\text{ed}$) $\S 16$ Exercise $2$: Subspaces of Finer Topologies
- Example 2, Sec. 31, in Munkres' TOPOLOGY, 2nd ed: Normality of $\mathbb{R}_l$ --- Why are these two sets disjoint?
- If $f:X\to Y$ is defined by $f(x)=1,x<0$; $f(x)=2,x\geq 0$, and $X$ and $Y$ have Sorgenfrey topology, is $f$ continuous?
Related Questions in LINDELOF-SPACES
- Proof by Contradiction--Product of Lindelöf Spaces is Lindelöf
- Show that if a topological space has at most countable basis, then the space is separable and Lindelöf
- Let $(X, \mathcal{T})$ be a metrizable space. Prove that $X$ Lindelöf implies that $X$ is separable.
- Show that a Regular space $X$ is Lindelöf if it has a locally finite open cover $\mathcal{U}$ such that $\rm{Fr}\,U$ has the Lindelöf property
- Proof for $\mathbb{R}_{l}$ is Lindelof
- Lindelöf and separable metric space
- Countable $\varepsilon$-net of measurable sets
- Munkres 37.3 maximal set with respect to the countable intersection property.
- Almost Lindelöf spaces.
- How to show $R_l$ is Lindelöf space?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here's a simple direct proof, which works just as well for the Sorgenfrey topology as for the usual topology of the line.
Let $\mathcal U$ be a collection of Sorgenfrey-open sets that covers $\mathbb R$. Let's say that a set $X\subseteq R$ is countably covered if $X$ is covered by countably many members of $\mathcal U$. We want to show that $\mathbb R$ is countably covered.
Consider any $a\in\mathbb R$, and let $C_a=\{x: x\ge a,\text{ and the interval }[a,x]\text{ is countably covered}\}$. It's easy to see that $\sup C_a=\infty$; assuming the contrary leads to a contradiction. Hence every finite interval $[a,b]$ is countably covered, and so is $\mathbb R=\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N}[-n,n]$.
P.S. I have been asked to explain why assuming that $\sup C_a=b\in\mathbb R$ leads to a contradiction. Let $b_n=b-\frac{b-a}{2^n}$ for $n=1,2,3,\dots,$ so that $a\lt b_n\lt b$ and $b_n\to b.$ Thus for each $n$ there is a countable collection $\mathcal S_n\subseteq\mathcal U$ such that $[a,b_n]$ is covered by $\mathcal S_n,$ and the half-open interval $[a,b)$ is covered by the countable collection $\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N}\mathcal S_n.$ Moreover, since $\mathcal U$ covers $\mathbb R,$ there is some $U\in\mathcal U$ such that $b\in U.$ Since $U$ is Sorgenfrey-open, there is some neighborhood $[b,b+\varepsilon)$ of $b$ (with $\varepsilon\gt0$) such that $[b,b+\varepsilon)\subseteq U.$ Then $[a,b+\varepsilon)$ is covered by $\{U\}\cup\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N}\mathcal S_n,$ whence $b+\frac\varepsilon2\in C_a,$ contradicting our assumption that $b=\sup C_a.$