I do not understand this test, could you do it with more details?
2026-04-08 11:35:38.1775648138
How can I prove the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality using Lagrange Multipliers
1.5k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROOF-EXPLANATION
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Total number of nodes in a full k-ary tree. Explanation
- Finding height of a $k$-ary tree
- How to get the missing brick of the proof $A \circ P_\sigma = P_\sigma \circ A$ using permutations?
- Inner Product Same for all Inputs
- Complex Derivatives in Polar Form
- Confused about how to prove a function is surjective/injective?
Related Questions in LAGRANGE-MULTIPLIER
- How to maximize function $\sum_{i=1}^{\omega}\max(0, \log(x_i))$ under the constraint that $\sum_{i=1}^{\omega}x_i = S$
- Extrema of multivalued function with constraint
- simple optimization with inequality restrictions
- Using a Lagrange multiplier to handle an inequality constraint
- Deriving the gradient of the Augmented Lagrangian dual
- Lagrange multiplier for the Stokes equations
- How do we determine whether we are getting the minimum value or the maximum value of a function using lagrange...
- Find the points that are closest and farthest from $(0,0)$ on the curve $3x^2-2xy+2y^2=5$
- Generalized Lagrange Multiplier Theorem.
- Lagrangian multipliers with inequality constraints
Related Questions in CAUCHY-SCHWARZ-INEQUALITY
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- Proving a small inequality
- Two Applications of Schwarz Inequality
- Prove $a^2+b^2+c^2\gt \frac {1}{2018}$ given $\left({3a + 28b + 35c}\right)\left({20a + 23b +33c}\right) = 1$
- Prove that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{ab+a+2}}+ \frac{1}{\sqrt{bc+b+2}}+ \frac{1}{\sqrt{ac+c+2}} \leq \frac{3}{2}$
- Prove that $a+b+c\le \frac {a^3}{bc} + \frac {b^3}{ac} + \frac {c^3}{ab}$
- Find the greatest and least values of $(\sin^{-1}x)^2+(\cos^{-1}x)^2$
- Inequality with $ab+bc+ca=3$
- Prove the next cyclic inequality
- How to prove this interesting inequality: $\frac{5x+3y+z}{5z+3y+x}+\frac{5y+3z+x}{5x+3z+y}+\frac{5z+3x+y}{5y+3x+z}\ge 3$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?


I think the wording of the proof you have attached above is what you are having difficulty with. Let me show a much simpler worded translation of the same proof below, which is also a well known application of Lagrange multipliers.
Let $\mathbf{a} = (a_1,.....,a_n) \in \mathbb{R}^n,$ and $\mathbf{b} = (b_1,....., b_n) \in \mathbb{R}^n.$
We need to show that $\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i b_i \le || \mathbf{a} || \cdot || \mathbf{b} ||.$
We can homogenize and assume without losing any generality that $|| \mathbf{a} || = 1.$
So the problem reduces to that of showing for any fixed $\mathbf{b} \in \mathbb{R}^n,$ we have $|| \mathbf{a} || = 1 \implies \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i b_i \le || \mathbf{b} ||.$
Let us put this problem in terms of Lagrange multipliers. To do so, we consider the function $\mathcal{L} = f - \lambda g, $ where $f ( \mathbf{a} ) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i b_i,$ and $g( \mathbf{a} ) = -1 + \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i ^2.$
Appealing to the result on Lagrange multipliers, we know that if $f$ attains a max/min at a point $\mathbf{x}$ subject to the condition that $g( \mathbf{x} ) = 0,$ then $ \frac{ \partial \mathcal{L} }{ \partial x_i } = 0$ for every $i \in \{1,....., n \}$ at this point of extremum.
From these equations, we see that we must have $x_i = \frac{b_i}{ 2 \lambda }$ for each $i \in \{ 1,....,n \}.$
Now, using the constraint $|| \mathbf{x} || = 1,$ one can see that $\lambda \in \{ 1, -1 \}.$
It is easy to see that the case $\lambda = -1$ gives the point of constrained local min of $f$ and $\lambda = 1$ yields the point of constrained local max of $f.$
You can now put $\lambda = 1$ to obtain the version of Cauchy Schwarz inequality mentioned above. Of course this is equivalent to the original Cauchy Schwarz inequality (as justified above by homogenization).