I came across these two curves while reading the wikipedia page on singularity theory: $$ y^2=x^3+x^2 $$ and $$ y^2=x^3 $$ The page says the cusp at $(0,0)$ can be seen to be qualitatively different but does not explain why they are different (other than visually). Is there a way to use the implicit function theorem?
Both partials vanish at the origin of course, but I was wondering if I could gain intuition by something like speed of decay (the first curves partial in x decays faster, but it doesn't look as "nasty" so I am not sure if this even makes sense).
Edit: To clarify this last bit, the derivative taking $x$ to be endogenous of the two curves are $$ y_1'=\frac{3x^2+2x}{2\sqrt{x^3+x^2}}\\ y_2'=\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{x}\\ $$ and while they are both bounded as you approach 0 from the right, the second has unbounded growth near zero. Does this mean anything?
Both curves have a double point at the origin, but they're of different type: in $y^2=x^3+x^2$ the origin is an “ordinary” double point with distinct tangents, in $y^2=x^3$ the origin is a cusp, meaning there is a single tangent.
You can see it with a simple strategy: if we intersect the first curve with a line $y=mx$, we get the equation $$ x^3+(1-m^2)x^2=0 $$ that intersects the curve at least twice, but there are three coincident roots for $m=\pm1$. These are the two tangents at the origin.
In the case of $y^2=x^3$ the equation is $$ x^3-m^2x^2=0 $$ that has three coincident roots only for $m=0$.