Why is gain equal to final value minus initial value, loss equal to initial value minus final value? How do you prove them mathematically?
2026-03-29 11:00:09.1774782009
How do you prove loss and gain?
23 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CHANGE-OF-VARIABLE
- Evaluation of $I=\iint_R e^{-(x^2+y^2)} \,dx\,dy$ by change of variable
- Undo a change of variables
- Optimization problem "change of variables" injectivity requirement
- Volume of revolution with coordinate transformation.
- $\int_0^1 \int_0^{1-y} \cos\Big( \frac{x-y}{x+y} \Big) \, dx dy$
- Does the following change of variable hold?
- Two variables with joint density: Change of variable technique using Jacobian for $U=\min(X,Y)$ and $V=\max(X,Y)$
- Calculate $\int\int_E e^{5x^2+2xy+y^2}dA$
- $X \sim R(0,1)$ and $Y \sim R(0,1)$ , where $X$ and $Y$ are independent.
- Given that $X,Y$ are independent $N(0,1)$ , show that $\frac{XY}{\sqrt{X^2+Y^2}},\frac{X^2-Y^2}{2\sqrt{X^2+Y^2}}$ are independent $N(0,\frac{1}{4})$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is because gain shows the amount by which the final value exceeds the initial value, whereas loss shows the amount by which the final value is less than the initial value. When we say 'amount' we mean the absolute value of the difference.
The actual difference we take is $V_f - V_i$ ($V_i=$ initial value, $V_f=$ final value), so when we say 'loss', we actually say that we 'gained' the negative of the amount lost. So, the amount lost is $|V_f - V_i|$ ($V_f < V_i$) = $V_i - V_f$, while the amount gained is $V_f - V_i$ ($V_f > V_i$).
Saying the truth , we don't need to prove anything. The definitions themselves imply what we need to know.
Please do tell me if any definition sounds ambiguous.