Let $\alpha = dx_1 - x_1^{-1} dx_2$ and we have $\gamma(t) = (t^2, t^3)$, where $t$ is between $0$ and $1$.
Are we going to do something like this
$$\gamma'(t) = 2t d1 + 3t^2 d2.$$
Then $\alpha(\gamma') = 2t - 3x_1t^2$ and then we can plug in $t^2$ for $x_1$ and get
$$2t - 3t^4$$ and then integrate that from $0$ to $1$?
How would you confirm or deny the fact that you could solve this using the end points alone (line integrals)?
You're very close. To clean up and clear up notation I will start from the beginning. The differential 1-form $\alpha$ is notation for the following
$$\int_{\gamma} P(x_1,x_2)\; dx_1 + Q(x_1,x_2) \; dx_2=\int_{\gamma} P(x_1,x_2)\; dx_1 + \int_{\gamma} Q(x_1,x_2)\; dx_2$$
which can be evaluated over a parameterization $\gamma(t)$ as
$$\int_{\gamma(t)} P\big(x_1(t),x_2(t)\big)\; \frac{dx_1}{dt}\;dt + \int_{\gamma(t)} Q\big(x_1(t),x_2(t)\big)\; \frac{dx_2}{dt}\; dt \;\; .$$
We can clearly combine this into one integral involving $t$ and for your case this ends up being
$$\int_0^1 (1)(2t) - (t^{-2})(3t^2) \; dt = \int_0^1 2t - 3 \; dt \;\; .$$
Aside from some inconvenient notational choices, your only error was that you used $\alpha = dx_1 - x_1 dx_2$ instead of $\alpha = dx_1 - x_1^{-1} dx_2$ as the problem statement dictates.