I am reading about fast growing hierarchies and the ordinal functions that are used in the indices, which allow us to categorise fast growing functions by selecting fundamental sequences for these large countable ordinals. For instance the Veblen functions, or the ordinal collapsing function $\psi$. The countability of all of these ordinals is obvious if we use $\mathsf{AC}_{\omega}$ ($\Rightarrow$ a countable of union of countable sets is countable). My question is, how does one prove the same statements in $\mathsf{ZF}?$ (for instance, for large countable ordinals arising from these functions)
2026-04-06 03:40:19.1775446819
How does $\mathsf{ZF}$ prove the countability of ordinals coming out of functions such as the ordinal collapse function?
139 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in AXIOM-OF-CHOICE
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Strength of $\sf ZF$+The weak topology on every Banach space is Hausdorff
- Example of sets that are not measurable?
- A,B Sets injective map A into B or bijection subset A onto B
- Equivalence of axiom of choice
- Proving the axiom of choice in propositions as types
- Does Diaconescu's theorem imply cubical type theory is non-constructive?
- Axiom of choice condition.
- How does Axiom of Choice imply Axiom of Dependent Choice?
Related Questions in ORDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- For each cardinal number $u$, there exists a smallest ordinal number $\alpha$ such that card$\alpha$ =$u$ .
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- Set membership as a relation on a particular set
- Goodstein's sequences and theorem.
- A proof of the simple pressing down lemma, is sup $x=x?$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- Difficulty in understanding cantor normal form
- What are $L_1$ and $L_2$ in the Gödel Constructible Hierarchy
- How many subsets are produced? (a transfinite induction argument)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The countability result is often proven differently depending on the definition, although unfortunately I'm not sure the proofs given in the original published literature are choiceless. When the definition of the ordinal collapsing function is simply based on the minimum excludant from one of the closure sets (like in Buchholz's "A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions", where $\psi_\nu(\alpha)=\textrm{min}\{\beta\mid\beta\notin C_\nu(\alpha)\}$) often a cardinality argument is used - for example Buchholz uses the fact that $C_0(\alpha)$'s cardinality is less than $\Omega$ to show that there must exist $\beta<\Omega$ where $\beta\notin C_0(\alpha)$, so $\psi_0(\alpha)<\Omega$.
Otherwise, for definitions not just based on the minimum excludant, at least for definitions appearing in literature there seems to be another common general form of them, similar to this sketch on Buchholz's "A simplified version of local predicativity" (full definition of $\psi_\pi(\alpha)$ for $\pi\in\textrm{Reg}\cap I$ on p.140):
We have a binary $C(\alpha,\beta)\supseteq\beta$, and $\psi_\Omega(\alpha)$ is the least $\beta$ where $C(\alpha,\beta)\cap\Omega\subseteq\beta$. Buchholz proves each $\psi_\Omega(\alpha)$ is countable, by showing that setting $$\beta=\textrm{sup}\{C(\alpha,0),\,C(\alpha,C(\alpha,0)),\,C(\alpha,C(\alpha,C(\alpha,0))),\,\ldots\}$$ gives us the necessary $C(\alpha,\beta)\cap\Omega\subseteq\beta$ condition, so $\psi_\Omega(\alpha)\leq\beta$. Unfortunately I'm not sure whether the demonstration that this supremum is countable makes use of the assumption "a countable union of countable sets is countable", so I'm not sure if this proof is choiceless.