I'll start by defining the constructible hierarchy for the sake of proper prefacing to the question. So we begin by defining:
$$ \operatorname{Def}(X) := \big\{ \{ y\mid y \in X \text{ and } (X,\in) \vDash \Phi(y, z_1, \ldots , z_n) \; \} \;\big|\; \Phi \text { is a first order formula and } z_1, \ldots, z_n \in X \big\}. $$
The Gödel Constructible Hierarchy then follows with transfinite recursion as:
$$ L_0 := \emptyset \\ L_{\alpha + 1} := \operatorname{Def}(L_\alpha). $$
Or if, $\lambda$ is a limit ordinal, then we can define:
$$ L_\lambda := \bigcup_{\alpha < \lambda} L_\alpha. $$
Note. This is not for school, I'm just reading Paul Cohen's book on the Continuum Hypothesis for funzies.
My question is: what is $L_1$ and $L_2$ in the hierarchy? Based on my working things out, it seems to me that:
$$ L_1 := \{\emptyset\}, \text{ and } \\ L_2 := \big\{\{\emptyset\}\big\}. $$
But, I feel like that may be incorrect. And, given that the last time I was looking over the material was 10 years ago, I figured that I'd ask the community.
Here is a slightly more general way to approach this issue.
This is not very hard, but now we combine this with the following observation:
To see why, we can prove this by recursion on the rank of the members of $X$: if $x$ is such that all the members of $x$ are definable, then $x$ is the unique set such that $y\in\leftrightarrow\bigvee_{u\in x}\varphi_u(y)$, where $\varphi_u$ is a formula defining $u$.
Now we get the full power of the construction, up to $\omega$:
So indeed, $L_1=\{\varnothing\}$ and $L_2=\{\varnothing,\{\varnothing\}\}$.