The answer to this question is $10 \choose 6$. However, I find this odd. Why would it be a combination in this case and not a permutation?
Ordering does not matter in combinations from my understanding, this would mean that $001 = 010$, which seems counterintuitive.
I do not understand why I have to use combinations for this problem.
-edit-
To clarify the issue, when I have two people {Bob, Alice}. I can only make 1 combination, since {Bob, Alice} and {Alice, Bob} are the same. However in a bitstring of two, I can have 01 and 10, wich are not the same.
"Ordering does not matter in combinations" means that "$0_a 1_a 0_b$" is the same as "$0_b 1_a 0_a$". You have 6 zeros: $0_a,0_b,0_c,0_d,0_e,0_f$ and you have 4 ones: $1_a,1_b,1_c,1_d$ and you have to find how many ways there are to arrange them. If order mattered there would but $10!$ ways.
The order of the the arrangement of the zeros as opposed to the ones does matter, but the order of the specific ones and the specific zeros within a pattern do.
There are $10!$ ways to place the ones and zeros. But as the zeros are interchangible and for any pattern of ones and zero there are $6!$ ways to order the specific zeros within that pattern, so we must divide by the $6!$ ways. Likewise for the ones we must divide by $4!$.
So the answer is ${10 \choose 6}$.
In you anology suppose you had {Alice, Bob} and you also had {Babar, Tantor} and you had to answer "how many ways are there to arrange two people and two elephants".
The answers are:
{Alice,Bob,Babar,Tantor} = {Alice, Bob, Tantor, Babar} = {Bob, Alice, Babar, Tantor} = {Bob, Alice, Tantor, Babar}
{Alice, Babar, Bob, Tantor} = {Alice,Tantor , Bob, Babar}={Bob,Tantor , Alice, Babar}={Bob,Babar , Alice, Tantor}
.... etc....
There are $4! = 24$ ways to arrange the four beings but as we can always switch the two humans and we can always switch the two elephants we get $24/2*2 = 6$ ways:
{(Alice or Bob), (Bob or Alice), (Babar or Tantor), (Tantor or Babar)}
{(Alice or Bob), (Babar or Tantor), (Bob or Alice),(Tantor or Babar)}
{(Alice or Bob), (Babar or Tantor),(Tantor or Babar), (Bob or Alice)}
{(Babar or Tantor), (Alice or Bob), (Bob or Alice), (Tantor or Babar)}
{(Babar or Tantor), (Alice or Bob), (Tantor or Babar), (Bob or Alice)}
{(Babar or Tantor), (Tantor or Babar), (Alice or Bob), (Bob or Alice)}