How many lines are there in the projective plane of $ \mathbb{F}_n $ ?
2026-03-31 03:33:49.1774928029
How many lines are there in the projective plane of a field with $n$ elements?
2.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FINITE-FIELDS
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- Reciprocal divisibility of equally valued polynomials over a field
- Solving overdetermined linear systems in GF(2)
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
- Field $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ with $\alpha=\sqrt[3]7+2i$
- Subfield of a finite field with prime characteristic
- Rank of a Polynomial function over Finite Fields
- Finite fields of order 8 and isomorphism
- Finding bases to GF($2^m$) over GF($2$)
- How to arrange $p-1$ non-zero elements into $A$ groups of $B$ where $p$ is a prime number
Related Questions in PROJECTIVE-GEOMETRY
- Visualization of Projective Space
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
- Determining the true shape of a section.
- Do projective transforms preserve circle centres?
- why images are related by an affine transformation in following specific case?(background in computer vision required)
- Calculating the polar of a given pole relative to a conic (with NO Calculus)
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Conic in projective plane isomorphic to projective line
- Noether normalization lemma
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The question is actually simpler than you think, but I'm going to start out from the context you supplied in the comments (which was helpful for me to gauge the solution.) I'll present several ways to see the same conclusion.
Method 1
Here is a way to count the lines if you can count the points (as you have demonstrated in the comments.)
In the projective plane, each line has $n+1$ points. Of course, any choice of two distinct points specifies a line. There are $\binom{n^2+n+1}{2}$ ways to do that. Of course, that is not the number of lines: we are duplicating the same lines over and over. The question is: how many times are we duplicating the same line?
Well, there are $\binom{n+1}{2}$ different ways to choose two points from a single line, and every time we do so, we are duplicating previous work. We should divide out by this factor, and when we do we get this
$$ \binom{n^2+n+1}{2}/\binom{n+1}{2}\\=\frac{(n^2+n+1)(n^2+n)}{2}/\frac{(n+1)n}{2}\\=\frac{(n^2+n+1)(n^2+n)}{2}\frac{2}{n^2+n}\\= n^2+n+1 $$
Gee, that's odd... this says there are as many lines as points. Is there a reason that should be the case? This leads us to backtrack and think about
Method 2
One important fact about projective planes over fields (or even division rings) is that they are self-dual. This duality states that every statement about points, lines and incidence in the plane can be changed in this way:
In our case the statement is only about points: "There are $n^2+n+1$ points." By duality the transformed statement is also true: "There are $n^2+n+1$ lines."
Method 3
In the comments, you mentioned you had counted points using the model of the projective plane as a completion of the affine plane $F_n^2$. Another important model for the projective plane over $F$ is this: the points of the projective plane over $F$ are $1$-dimensional subspaces of the vector space $F^3$, and the lines of the projective plane are planes in $F^3$.
Here it is easy to count $1$-dimensional subspaces. $F_n^3$ has $n^3-1$ nonzero vectors, each of which generate a $1$-dimensinoal subspace. However, nonzero scalar multiples of a vector generates the same subspace, repeating work. We are repeating ourselves $n-1$ times, then. So there are $(n^3-1)/(n-1)=n^2+n+1$ $1$-dimensional subspaces of $F_n^3$ (aka points of the projective plane over $F_n$.) Everything mentioned in Method 1 can be translated into a statement about counting planes in $F_n^3$, and so the same number is reached. This is not really that different from Method 1, but I thought you might find the viewpoint useful.