I am discovering class numbers and ideal class groups. Going through Wikipedia, the example $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ is considered along with the ideal $J=(1+\sqrt{-5}, 2)$. Two facts are troubling me (I might haven't understood that well ideals and quotients):
- $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]/(1+\sqrt{-5}) \simeq \mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}$
- $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]/J \simeq \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$
For the first one, I have no idea of how such computations are handled. For the second, I would say that the quotient of $Z/6$ by $Z/2$ is $Z/3$, isn't it?
This is an instance of the more general question I have in mind: how do one generally compute a quotient ring? Is there any standard manner to do so? (at least for well presented rings or groups)
Thanks for any comment and help.
For the first question: $(1 + \sqrt{-5}) (1-\sqrt{-5}) = 6$ and $(1 + \sqrt{-5})\sqrt{-5} = \sqrt{-5}-5$. In particular, in the quotient all the classes are represented by integers (because $[\sqrt{-5}]=[5]$) included between $0$ and $5$ (because $[6]=[0]$). Your ring could still be isomorphic to a proper quotient of $\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}$, but somehow you can check that the positive integers smaller than $6$ are not sent to $0$ (because they are not multiples of $1+\sqrt{-5}$). The second case is similar, but also $2$ is sent to $0$, hence you get a quotient of $\mathbb{Z} / 2 \mathbb{Z}$ and again you can somehow check that at least $1$ is not sent to $0$ (i.e., it is not a linear combination of $1+\sqrt{-5}$ and $2$) (Wikipedia proves that $J$ is not principal, so in particular it is not $(1)$).
The intuition you mentioned is wrong. We are applying the Third isomorphism theorem for rings, which says that
$$ (\mathbb{Z} / 6\mathbb{Z}) / ( 2\mathbb{Z} / 6\mathbb{Z} ) \cong \mathbb{Z} / 2\mathbb{Z}.$$