Starting from this general formulation of Ito process \begin{equation} X_s = X_0 + \int_0^s g(X_r, r) dr + \int_0^s f(X_r, r) dW_r \quad \text{ for } s \in [0,t]. \end{equation} how can I get to this one? \begin{equation} dX_s = g(X_s, s)ds + f(X_s,s) dW_s \quad \text{ for } s \in [0,t], \end{equation}
2026-03-25 06:00:11.1774418411
How to derive the differential notation of Ito process
148 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
- Probability being in the same state
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Why does there exists a random variable $x^n(t,\omega')$ such that $x_{k_r}^n$ converges to it
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Why has $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s$ the same distribution as $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s-B_t$ for a Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
- What is the name of the operation where a sequence of RV's form the parameters for the subsequent one?
- Markov property vs. transition function
- Variance of the integral of a stochastic process multiplied by a weighting function
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-CALCULUS
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Why does there exists a random variable $x^n(t,\omega')$ such that $x_{k_r}^n$ converges to it
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Mean and variance of $X:=(k-3)^2$ for $k\in\{1,\ldots,6\}$.
- 4th moment of a Wiener stochastic integral?
- Unsure how to calculate $dY_{t}$
- What techniques for proving that a stopping time is finite almost surely?
- Optional Stopping Theorem for martingales
- $dX_t=\alpha X_t \,dt + \sqrt{X_t} \,dW_t, $ with $X_0=x_0,\,\alpha,\sigma>0.$ Compute $E[X_t] $ and $E[Y]$ for $Y=\lim_{t\to\infty}e^{-\alpha t}X_t$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Well, I didn't want to write an answer, but...
Writing $dy=f(x)\,dx$ is just another way of writing $\dfrac{dy}{dx}=f(x)$, or $\displaystyle y(x)=y_0+\int^x_0 f(t)\,dt$. Formally, everything is clear: $y\to dy$, $y_0\to0$ (constant), $\displaystyle \int^x_0 f(t)\,dt\to f(x)\,dx$, so the $d$ is just a linear operator, and that's all rather trivial. The non-trivial part is the chain rule: if you have $$\frac{df(x,y)}{dx}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+y'\,\frac{\partial f}{\partial y},$$ that becomes $$df(x,y)=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,dx+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\,dy.$$ With Ito integrals, you add the trivial rule $\displaystyle \int^x_0 f(t)\,dW_t\to f(x)\,dW_x$, and the non-trivial rule $$d f(t,X_t)=\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+\mu_t\,\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+\frac12\,\sigma^2_t\,\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2}\right)\,dt+\sigma_t\,\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,dW_t$$ whenever $$dX_t=\mu_t\,dt+\sigma_t\,dW_t,$$ that's just the equivalent of the chain rule in this context. Formally, you could say that you just take one more term in the Taylor expansion, and use $(dW_t)^2=dt$, but that can't really replace the proof of Ito's formula in a rigorous treatment.