Ok, so I'm trying to learn multivariable calculus. As I come from a math background, I want to understand it as rigurously as possible. I've seen that differential geometry does the job, but I don't want to go that far yet. So my question is how to make sense of partial derivatives w.r.t to other coordinate systems besides the linear ones? For example, polar coordinates do not behave nicely under linear transformations. Even worse, the vector basis is local, like in physics, so it seems a nightmare to keep track of how to write things like gradients in a vector basis that is always changing with the point. I want a mathematical explanation to keep me sane, physical analogies will not do.
2026-03-29 13:47:19.1774792039
How to make sense of partial derivatives w.r.t to polar coordinates?
55 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MULTIVARIABLE-CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- $\iint_{S} F.\eta dA$ where $F = [3x^2 , y^2 , 0]$ and $S : r(u,v) = [u,v,2u+3v]$
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- Prove all tangent plane to the cone $x^2+y^2=z^2$ goes through the origin
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Find the directional derivative in the point $p$ in the direction $\vec{pp'}$
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Define in which points function is continuous
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DERIVATIVE
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Partial derivative of a summation
- How might I find, in parametric form, the solution to this (first order, quasilinear) PDE?
- Solving a PDE given initial/boundary conditions.
- Proof for f must be a constant polynomial
Related Questions in POLAR-COORDINATES
- Second directional derivative of a scaler in polar coordinate
- polar coordinate subtitution
- $dr$ in polar co-ordinates
- Finding the centroid of a triangle in hyperspherical polar coordinates
- Arc length of polar function and x interceps
- Evaluation of $I=\iint_R e^{-(x^2+y^2)} \,dx\,dy$ by change of variable
- Finding area bound by polar graph
- Question about the roots of a complex polynomial
- Polar Area Integral with Absolute Function
- How to compute 'polar form' of a line given two points in cartesian coordinate system?
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL
- In a directional slope field, how can a straight line be a solution to a differential equation?
- The Equation of Motion of a Snowball
- Supremum of the operator norm of Jacobian matrix
- Directional continuous derivative on vectors of a base implies differentiability in $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Need explanation for intuition behind rewriting $dy$ in terms of $dx$
- Does the double integrative of d^{2}x make sense from a mathematical point of view?
- Functional with 4th grade characteristic equation
- need to equate MATLAB and MATHEMATICA solutions
- Formula for Curvature
- Showing that $\Psi(f) = \int^{b}_{a}\phi(f(x))dx$ is differentiable.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Polar coordinates are a map $\varphi:[-\pi,\pi)\times[0,\infty)\to\mathbb R^2, \varphi(\theta,r)=r(\cos\theta,\sin\theta)$.
Now expressing a function $f:\mathbb R^2\to U$ for some suitable $U$ in polar coordinates just means finding the function $f\circ\varphi$. The partial derivatives with respect to the polar coordinates are now simply the usual partial derivatives of $f\circ\varphi$.
There is some dodginess at the edges of the domain of $\varphi$, but on its interior it works exactly this way.