I am given the relation in $\mathbb{R}$: $xRy$ if $x\le 2^y$. I want to prove this has the comparability property, so I know I start with let $x,y\in \mathbb{R}$. Then I need to show either $xRy$ or $yRx$. I am not too sure how to go about it.
2026-04-02 03:21:02.1775100062
How to prove comparability property & writing its proof
872 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ELEMENTARY-SET-THEORY
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Composition of functions - properties
- Existence of a denumerble partition.
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- Show that $\omega^2+1$ is a prime number.
- A Convention of Set Builder Notation
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- Problem with Cartesian product and dimension for beginners
- Proof that a pair is injective and surjective
- Value of infinite product
Related Questions in INEQUALITY
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- Solution to a hard inequality
- Is every finite descending sequence in [0,1] in convex hull of certain points?
- Bound for difference between arithmetic and geometric mean
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- How to prove that $\pi^{e^{\pi^e}}<e^{\pi^{e^{\pi}}}$
- Proving a small inequality
Related Questions in PROOF-WRITING
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Do these special substring sets form a matroid?
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- Total number of nodes in a full k-ary tree. Explanation
- Prove all limit points of $[a,b]$ are in $[a,b]$
- $\inf A = -\sup (-A)$
- Prove that $\sup(cA)=c\sup(A)$.
- Supremum of Sumset (Proof Writing)
- Fibonacci Numbers Proof by Induction (Looking for Feedback)
- Is my method correct for to prove $a^{\log_b c} = c^{\log_b a}$?
Related Questions in RELATIONS
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Is a relation on which every element is related with itself alone transitive?
- Relation power composition
- Order relation proof
- Order relation proof ...
- How to identify if a given Hasse diagram is a lattice
- Is the relation < a strict total order?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Finding all reflexive binary relations of a set
- Showing that a relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
Related Questions in REAL-NUMBERS
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Possible Error in Dedekind Construction of Stillwell's Book
- Is the professor wrong? Simple ODE question
- Concept of bounded and well ordered sets
- Why do I need boundedness for a a closed subset of $\mathbb{R}$ to have a maximum?
- Prove using the completeness axiom?
- Does $\mathbb{R}$ have any axioms?
- slowest integrable sequence of function
- cluster points of sub-sequences of sequence $\frac{n}{e}-[\frac{n}{e}]$
- comparing sup and inf of two sets
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose for contradictory purposes that $R$ does not have the comparability property.
Then there must be some pair of $x$ and $y$ such that $x\not R y$ and $y\not R x$. In other words, there must be some pair of $x$ and $y$ such that $x>2^y$ and $y>2^x$.
Since $y>2^x$ implies that $2^y>2^{2^x}$ we have $x>2^y>2^{2^x}$ and in particular we have $x>2^{2^x}$.
Now, one of three things will be true about $x$. Either $x\leq 0$ or $0<x< 2$ or $x\geq 2$.
Case 1: $x\leq 0$: In the case that $x\leq 0$ we have $0\geq x>2^{2^x}$ however since $2^a>0$ for all real $a$ we have $0\geq x>2^{2^x}\geq 2^0=1$ but since $0\not\geq 1$ this is a contradiction.
Case 2: $0<x<2$:
Case 3: $2\leq x$: (left as excercise to reader) Use what you know about the comparison of $x$ vs $2^x$ when $x\geq 2$.
Since in all three cases we arrive at a contradiction, we see that there cannot be any such $x$ and thus there cannot be any pair $x,y$ such that neither of $xRy$ nor $yRx$ is true, therefore at least one of $xRy$ or $yRx$ must be true and the relation is indeed comparable.