According to 'Applied Data Science' (Langmore and Krasner), if we have linear regression equation Y = Xw + E then likelihood p(Y | w) = pE(Y − Xw) (pE is pdf of error E)
2026-03-25 01:18:15.1774401495
How to prove that likelihood p(Y | w) = pE(Y − Xw) (pE is pdf of error E)?
113 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in BAYES-THEOREM
- Question to calculating probability
- Bayes' Theorem, what am I doing wrong?
- A question about defective DVD players and conditional probabaility.
- Is my derivation for the maximum likelihood estimation for naive bayes correct?
- 1 Biased Coin and 1 Fair Coin, probability of 3rd Head given first 2 tosses are head?
- Conditional Probability/Bayes Theory question
- Dependence of posterior probability on parameters
- Probability Question on Bayes' Theorem
- Coin probability
- What is the probability of an event to happen in future based on the past events?
Related Questions in LINEAR-REGRESSION
- Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) Line Fitting / Regression
- How does the probabilistic interpretation of least squares for linear regression works?
- A question regarding standardized regression coefficient in a regression model with more than one independent variable
- Product of elements of a linear regression
- Covariance of least squares parameter?
- Contradiction in simple linear regression formula
- Prove that a random error and the fitted value of y are independent
- Is this a Generalized Linear Model?
- The expected value of mean sum of square for the simple linear regression
- How to get bias-variance expression on linear regression with p parameters?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It appears that you are asking about the probability density of $Y$ for a fixed value of $w.$ Conventionally one distinguished between the notation for a random variable and that of the argument to its density function or to its c.d.f., often by using a capital letter for the random variable and a lower-case letter for the argument. Note that without this distinction, an expression like $\Pr(Y\le y)$ could not be understood, and there are yet other difficulties besides that. Hence we seek $p_Y(y).$ The linear regression model say that $Y = Xw+\varepsilon,$ where typically $Y$ is an $n\times1$ column vector, $\varepsilon$ is an $n\times 1$ column vector of independent random variables with expected value $0$ and equal variances, $X$ is an $n\times p$ matrix, and $w$ is a $p\times 1$ matrix. The values of $X$ and $Y$ are observed; the values of $\varepsilon$ and $w$ are not, and one estimates $w$ by using least-squares.
Suppose the $n$ entries in $\varepsilon$ are identically distributed and let $f$ be their common density. Then the probability that $\varepsilon$ falls in some specified set $A$ is $$ \int_A f(x) \, dx. $$ The probability that $Y$ falls in any specified set $B$ is the probability that $Xw+\varepsilon$ is in $B$. The event that $Xw+\varepsilon$ is in $B$ is the same as the event that $\varepsilon$ is in the set $B-Xw = \{ b-Xw : b\in B \}.$ Thus that probability is $$ \int_{B\,-\,Xw} f(x) \, dx. $$ This is the same as $$ \int_B f(y - Xw)\, dy $$ with the same function $f,$ if $y = Xw+x.$ The change of variables does not necessitate multiplying $dy$ by anything to get $dx,$ since the change of variables consists only of addition of a constant (and "constant" in this context means not depending on $x$ or $y$). And $x\in B-Xw$ if and only if $y\in B.$