Let $\mathcal{I} = \{ [a,b) : a \leq b, a,b \in \mathbb{R} \}$
Prove that if $I \subseteq J \implies \mathcal{l}(I) \leq \mathcal{l}(J)$ where $I,J \in \mathcal{I}$
The proof seems trivial and intuitive but, I want to write it formally:
Here is my attempt:
Let $I \subseteq J$ where $I,J \in \mathcal{I}$
Define: $I= \{x \in \mathbb{R} | b \leq x \leq c \}$
and $J= \{y \in \mathbb{R} | a \leq y \leq d \}$
So we have $a \leq b \leq c \leq d$
$\mathcal{l}(I)= c-b$
$\mathcal{l}(J)= d-a$
But since $c \leq d$ and $a \leq b \implies -a \geq -b$
Thus, $c-b \leq d-a \implies \mathcal{l}(I) \leq \mathcal{l}(J)$
First off, note you've written $I = [b,c]$ and $J=[a,d]$ rather than the intended $I = [b,c)$ and $J=[a,d)$. It's entirely possible this is just a typo.
Also, if you want to write it formally, you need to start with $I \subseteq J$ and $I,J \in \mathcal{I}$, not $a \leq b \leq c \leq d$ and $I = [b,c), J = [a,d).$
That is, you'll need to assume $a \leq d$ and $b \leq c$ where $[b,c) \subseteq [a,d)$ and prove $a\leq b$ (almost immediate) and $c\leq d$ (requires a short argument).
Other than those two issues, it's fine.