$(q \lor r)\wedge p\vdash(q\wedge p)\lor (r\wedge p)$
After making the first assumption and splitting it up using ∧-elimination, I get stuck.
Can anyone help?
$(q \lor r)\wedge p\vdash(q\wedge p)\lor (r\wedge p)$
After making the first assumption and splitting it up using ∧-elimination, I get stuck.
Can anyone help?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
In natural deduction, we will have something like the following deduction rule, $\lor$-elimination:
where $\phi, \psi, \chi$ are formulas, and $\Gamma, \Delta$ are sets of formulas. The name stems from the fact that in the last sequent, the antecedent contains a disjunction that the consequent doesn't.
In the present case, we are seeking to prove: $$q \lor r, p \vdash (q \land p) \lor (r \land p)$$
Can you see how to use $\lor$-elimination to achieve this?