I am wondering which one of the following statements are a more standard way of saying a sequence has cubic growth rate:
- The sequence $\lambda_k$ has cubic growth rate.
- The growth rate of the sequence $\lambda_k$ is of cubic order.
- The growth rate of the sequence $\lambda_k$ is cubic.
- The sequence $\lambda_k$ is of order $\Theta(k^3)$.
This wording is stated in the classic Analytic Combinatorics by P. Flajolet and R. Sedgewick in Appendix $A.2$ Asymptotic notation together with the definition and correct wording of further asymptotic symbols.
Conclusion:
Point (1) to (3) do not precisely state that $\lambda_k$ is big-Oh of $k^3$ since the formulation bounded from above or an equivalent formulation is missing.
Point (4) addresses with $\Theta(k^3)$ a different situation, namely $\lambda_k$ is both bounded from above as well as bounded from below by a constant times $k^3$.
Hint: Historical information around Big-Oh and friends is presented in Big Omega and Big Omicron and Big Theta (1976) by D.E. Knuth.