I'm having troubles in simplifying a differential equation to find its solutions. Consider this ODE: $$ \frac{1}{r} \, \frac{d}{dr} \Bigl( \frac{r}{B} \, \frac{d B}{dr} \Bigr) = k \, B^2, \tag{1} $$ where $k$ is just a real constant and $B(r)$ is the function to be found. I already know one solution of this equation (it was found by guessing, trial and errors): $$ B(r) = \frac{\beta}{1 + \lambda r^2}, \tag{2} $$ where $\beta$ and $\lambda = k \beta^2 / 4$ are arbitrary constants. My goal is to transform (1) into an integral so I could find back the solution (2). I'm yet unable to find a change of variable that makes that equation solvable analyticaly. I tried $u = 1/B$, and $B = e^{\phi(r)}$ (and few other trials). Any idea how to solve (1)?
2026-04-22 01:15:46.1776820546
How to solve this relatively simple non-linear ODE?
105 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in FUNCTIONS
- Functions - confusion regarding properties, as per example in wiki
- Composition of functions - properties
- Finding Range from Domain
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Lower bound of bounded functions.
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
Related Questions in SOLUTION-VERIFICATION
- Linear transform of jointly distributed exponential random variables, how to identify domain?
- Exercise 7.19 from Papa Rudin: Gathering solutions
- Proof verification: $\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4\nmid(n^2+2)$
- Proof verification: a function with finitely many points of discontinuity is Riemann integrable
- Do Monoid Homomorphisms preserve the identity?
- Cantor-Lebesgue's theorem
- If $a$ is an integer, prove that $\gcd(14a + 3, 21a + 4) = 1$.
- Number theory gcd
- $|G| > 1$ and not prime implies existence of a subgroup other than two trivial subgroups
- Prove/Disprove: Sum of im/ker of linear transformation contained in ker/im of each linear trasnfromation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since the equation features only multiplication and division, it is worth checking whether it has some kind of homogeneous continuous group of symmetries. Indeed, it is straight-forward to check that the one-parameter Lie group of transformations \begin{align} & r \, \mapsto \, e^{s}r\\ & B \, \mapsto \, e^{-s}B \end{align} leaves the equation $$\frac{1}{r} \frac{d}{dr}\left(\frac{r}{B} \frac{dB}{dr}\right) \,=\, k\, B^2$$ invariant (unchanged) Furthermore, the quantity $$C = rB$$ is also invariant under the action of the one-parameter group of symmetries. The vector field that generates this group of transformation is $$r\,\frac{\partial }{\partial r} \, -\, B\,\frac{\partial }{\partial B}$$ Now, using the invariant quantity $C$, we can construct a change of variables (a local diffeomorphism) that rectifies the latter vector field. In other words, if we define the change of variables \begin{align} &s = \ln(r)\\ &C = rB \end{align} with inverse \begin{align} &r = e^s\\ &B = e^{-s}\,C \end{align} the vector field above transforms into $$r\,\frac{\partial }{\partial r} \, -\, B\,\frac{\partial }{\partial B} \, =\, \frac{\partial }{\partial s}$$ and so, in the new coordinates $s, \,C$ the original equation should be invariant under the simple translation-transformation \begin{align} &s \mapsto s + \tilde{s}\\ &C \mapsto C \end{align} which means that the transformed equation should not depend explicitly on the new $s$ variable. Indeed, since $dr = e^s ds$ we can write the equation in the new coordinates as follows: $$\frac{1}{r} \frac{d}{dr}\left(\frac{r}{B} \frac{dB}{dr}\right) \,=\, k\, B^2$$ $$\frac{1}{e^s} \, \frac{d}{e^sds}\left(\frac{e^s}{e^{-s}\,C} \frac{d}{e^s ds}\Big(e^{-s}\,C\Big)\right) \,=\, k\, \big(e^{-s}\,C\big)^2$$ $$e^{-2s} \, \frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{e^s}{C} \frac{d}{ds}\Big(e^{-s}\,C\Big)\right) \,=\, k\, e^{-2s}\,C^2$$ $$\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{e^s}{C} \frac{d}{ds}\Big(e^{-s}\,C\Big)\right) \,=\, k\, C^2$$ $$\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{e^s}{C} \Big(e^{-s}\,\frac{dC}{ds} - e^{-s}\,C\Big)\right) \,=\, k\, C^2$$ $$\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{e^s}{C} \, e^{-s}\, \Big(\frac{dC}{ds} - C\Big)\right) \,=\, k\, C^2$$ $$\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{1}{C}\, \Big(\frac{dC}{ds} - C\Big)\right) \,=\, k\, C^2$$ $$\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{1}{C}\, \frac{dC}{ds} - 1\right) \,=\, k\, C^2$$ so now it is clear that the equation in the new variables is $$\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{1}{C}\, \frac{dC}{ds}\right) \,=\, k\, C^2$$ and does not depend on the variable $s$ explicitly. The next step is to introduce the extra variable $$P \, =\, \frac{1}{C}\, \frac{dC}{ds}$$ which turns the equation into $$\frac{dP}{ds} \, =\, k\,C^2$$ and as a result of this substitution, we obtain the following system of differential equations \begin{align} &\frac{dC}{ds} \, =\, C \, P\\ &\\ &\frac{dP}{ds} \, =\, k\,C^2 \end{align} We can try to find a first integral of the latter system as follows \begin{align} &\frac{dP}{dC} \, =\, \frac{k\,C^2}{C\,P} \end{align} \begin{align} &\frac{dP}{dC} \, =\, \frac{k\,C}{P}\\ \end{align} $$P\,dP \, =\, k\,C \,dC $$ so after integrating both sides $$P^2 \,=\, k\,C^2 \, +\, b$$ where $b$ is an arbitrary constant. Substituting back $$P \,=\, \frac{1}{C} \, \frac{dC}{ds}$$ we obtain the separable, integrable, differential equation $$\left(\frac{1}{C}\,\frac{dC}{ds}\right)^2 \, =\, k\,C^2 \, +\, b$$ $$\frac{1}{C}\,\frac{dC}{ds}\, =\, \pm \sqrt{\,k\,C^2 \, +\, b\,}$$ $$\frac{dC}{ds}\, =\, \pm\, C\,\sqrt{\,k\,C^2 \, +\, b\,}$$ The solution to the latter equation can be obtain by integrating $$\pm\int \, \frac{dC}{C\,\sqrt{\,k\,C^2 \, +\, b\,}} \, =\, \int ds$$ and, consequently, it can be written in implicit form as follows $$\mp\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{b}}\, \tanh^{-1}\left(\sqrt{\,1 \, + \,\frac{k}{b} \,C^2\,}\right) \, =\, s - a$$ where $a$ is another arbitrary constant. Rewrite it $$\sqrt{\,1 \, + \,\frac{k}{b} \,C^2\,} \, =\,\tanh\Big( \mp \sqrt{b}\,(s - a)\,\Big)$$ $$1 \, + \,\frac{k}{b} \,C^2\, =\,\tanh^2\Big( \mp \sqrt{b}\,(s - a)\,\Big)$$ $$\frac{k}{b} \,C^2\, =\,\tanh^2\Big( \mp \sqrt{b}\,(s - a)\,\Big) \, -\, 1$$ and solve for $C$ $$C\, =\,\pm\,\sqrt{\,\frac{b}{k}\,\tanh^2\Big( \mp \sqrt{b}\,(s - a)\,\Big) \, -\, \frac{b}{k}\,}$$ Finally, return to the original variables \begin{align} &s = \ln(r)\\ &C = rB \end{align} which leave us with the solution $$r\,B\, =\,\pm\,\sqrt{\,\frac{b}{k}\,\tanh^2\Big( \mp \sqrt{b}\,\big(\ln(r) - a\big)\,\Big) \, -\, \frac{b}{k}\,}$$ or explicitly $$B\, =\,\pm\,\frac{1}{r}\sqrt{\,\frac{b}{k}\,\tanh^2\Big( \mp \sqrt{b}\,\big(\ln(r) - a\big)\,\Big) \, -\, \frac{b}{k}\,}$$ After relabling the constants $\alpha = \mp\,a \,\sqrt{b}$ and $\beta = \mp\,\sqrt{b}$, one can write the final solution as follows $$B\, =\,\pm\,\frac{1}{r}\sqrt{\,\frac{\beta^2}{k}\,\tanh^2\Big( \beta\,\ln(r) - \alpha\,\Big) \, -\, \frac{\beta^2}{k}\,}$$ $$B\, =\,\pm\,\frac{\beta}{r}\sqrt{\,-\,\frac{1}{k \, \cosh^2\Big( \beta\,\ln(r) - \alpha\,\Big)} \,}$$ $$B\, =\,\pm\,\frac{\beta}{\sqrt{-\,k\,}\,}\,\frac{1}{\,r \, \cosh\Big( \beta\,\ln(r) - \alpha\,\Big)}$$ $$B\, =\,\pm\,\frac{\beta}{\sqrt{-\,k\,}\,}\,\frac{1}{\,r \, \cosh\Big( \beta\,\ln(r) - \alpha\,\Big)}$$ so maybe it simplifies to something like this $$B\, =\,\,\frac{\beta}{\sqrt{-\,k\,}\,}\, \frac{2 \, \lambda \,\, r^{\beta-1}}{\,1 \, + \, \lambda^2 \,\, r^{2\beta}}$$ where the constant $\lambda = \pm e^{-\alpha}$