I am not quite understand what a point of a scheme really is. It's not like the definition of a point in a usual topology, such as Euclidean space. In Hartshorne's, a point seems to be a prime ideal of a given ring, but I am not quite sure. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!
2026-03-28 10:16:47.1774693007
How to understand a point of a scheme?
985 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in SCHEMES
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Do torsion-free $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules on curves have dimension one?
- $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ is the sections of Spec $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ minus the origin?
- Finitely generated $k-$algebras of regular functions on an algebraic variety
- Is every open affine subscheme of an algebraic $k-$variety an affine $k-$variety?
- Scheme Theoretic Image (Hartshorne Ex.II.3.11.d)
- Is this a closed embedding of schemes?
- Adjunction isomorphism in algebraic geometry
- Closed connected subset of $\mathbb{P}_k^1$
- Why can't closed subschemes be defined in an easier way?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There are two notions of a point in algebraic geometry. The first one, and the one I think you are most interested in is the following definition.
The first definition
First, let's recall the definition of a scheme. A scheme is a locally ringed space which is locally affine (i.e. locally isomorphic to $\newcommand\Spec{\operatorname{Spec}}\Spec A$ for a ring $A$). And as a reminder, a locally ringed space is a topological space, $X$, with a sheaf of rings, $\mathcal{O}_X$ whose stalks are local rings.
I've bolded the words topological space, since that part is the relevant part for talking about points of schemes (at least in this first sense). This gives us the definition:
A point of a scheme $(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$ is a point of the underlying topological space $X$. Thus points of a scheme are in fact the points of a topological space.
Now you may be wondering, well how do prime ideals enter the picture here? And the answer is, if $A$ is a ring, then the underlying topological space of $\Spec A$ is the set of all prime ideals of $A$ with the Zariski topology on them. Thus points of $\Spec A$ are precisely the prime ideals of $A$. Since general schemes are locally affine, we can think of the points of a general scheme as being a prime ideal in some affine open set containing that point, however the precise prime ideal depends entirely on the choice of neighborhood of the point and the isomorphism with the spectrum of some ring.
The other definition
If $X$ and $Y$ are schemes, we call a morphism from $Y\to X$ a $Y$-valued point of $X$, or if $Y=\Spec A$ is affine, we also say it is an $A$-valued point of $X$. The set of $Y$ valued points of a scheme $X$ is then just $\operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$, and the functor $Y\mapsto \operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$ is called the functor of points of the scheme $X$, since to a given scheme $Y$ it assigns the set of $Y$-valued points.
I'm not quite sure of the precise history of the usage of the term point for a morphism of schemes, but in many ways it makes sense. For example, if $Y=\Spec k$ where $k$ is a field, then a morphism from $Y\to X$ is determined by a choice of (topological) point $x\in X$ and a choice of map from $\kappa(x)\to k$, where $\kappa(x)$ is the residue field of $X$ at $x$, $\mathcal{O}_{X,x}/\mathfrak{m}_x$.
Anyway, I think this second definition is not likely to be what you meant, so I won't say too much more on it.