I try to $\epsilon$-$\delta$ to show that if I fix $\alpha$ small enough, for $\forall \epsilon>0$, there exists a $N$ such that $k>N$, I want $$\frac{c}{\alpha}\exp(-2^k)+\exp\left(-\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)\le \epsilon$$ where $c>0$ is a constant.
I think I just need to let $\frac{c}{\alpha}\exp(-2^k)<\epsilon$ which is $$2^k>\log\left(\frac{c}{\alpha \epsilon}\right)$$ But I do not know how to deal with $\exp\left(-\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)$. This term is small enough...
The statement:
For $\forall \epsilon>0$, we set $\epsilon-\exp\left(-\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)>0$, then we can find $$2^k>log(\frac{c}{\alpha(\epsilon-\exp(-1/\alpha))})$$ such that $$\frac{c}{\alpha}\exp(-2^k)+\exp\left(-\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)\le \epsilon$$
As you have stated the problem, the inequality doesn't hold when
$$\varepsilon -\exp\left(-\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)\le 0$$
since, assuming $\frac c \alpha>0$, $\forall k, \: \frac{c}{\alpha}\exp(-2^k)>0$.
The problem should be stated as follows
Then fixed $\varepsilon>0$, we need to set $\alpha$ such that
$$\varepsilon -\exp\left(-\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)=\varepsilon_2 >0$$
and, assuming $\frac c \alpha>0$, we obtain
$$\frac{c}{\alpha}\exp(-2^k)+\exp\left(-\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)\le \varepsilon \iff \frac{c}{\alpha}\exp(-2^k)\le \varepsilon_2 \iff k\ge \frac1{\log 2}\log\left(\log\left(\frac{c}{\alpha \varepsilon_2}\right)\right)$$
The case with $\alpha <0$, if necessary, can be discussed in a similar way.