I don't know what the first thing I should do for this question is. How can the principles of the multivariate form of the chain rule be applied to solve this question? Thanks.
I am trying using this version of the chain rule

2026-03-25 03:07:34.1774408054
How to use multivariate chain rule and table of values to find partial derivatives?
1.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- If $f ◦f$ is differentiable, then $f ◦f ◦f$ is differentiable
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Number of roots of the e
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
Related Questions in MULTIVARIABLE-CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- $\iint_{S} F.\eta dA$ where $F = [3x^2 , y^2 , 0]$ and $S : r(u,v) = [u,v,2u+3v]$
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- Prove all tangent plane to the cone $x^2+y^2=z^2$ goes through the origin
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Find the directional derivative in the point $p$ in the direction $\vec{pp'}$
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Define in which points function is continuous
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DERIVATIVE
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Partial derivative of a summation
- How might I find, in parametric form, the solution to this (first order, quasilinear) PDE?
- Solving a PDE given initial/boundary conditions.
- Proof for f must be a constant polynomial
Related Questions in CHAIN-RULE
- Show that $g \circ f$ is n times differentiable
- Chain rule with intermediate vector function
- Derivative and chain rule exam problem
- Derivative of square of skew symmetric matrix times a vector wrt the argument of the skew symmetric argument
- Show that certain properties remain under inversion
- Multi-variable chain rule - confusion in application
- Chain rule proof by definition
- Find the value of the function (Chain rule)
- Chain rule problem: given $f(x)=\sqrt{4x+7}$ and $g(x)=e^{x+4}$, compute $f(g(x))'$.
- Chain Rule partial derivatives and the wave equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

The first thing is to understand how the chain rule applies to your problem. As the problem indicates you have $x=e^u + \sin v, y = e^u + \cos v.$ Where does that fit into the chain rule formula? (The unfortunate thing with this statement of the chain rule is that $u$ means different things on the two sides of the equation. On the left-hand side it means $g,$ and on the right-hand side, it means $f$. This isn't a peculiarity of the chain rule for several variables. The chain rule in one variable also exhibits this phenomenon.)
Anyway, on the left-hand side, $u$ means $g$ and $t_i$ is one of the variables we're differentiating with respect to: say $u$. Then on the right-hand side, $u$ means $f,$ and the $x_i$ are the variables in the definition of $f$. So we can take $x_1 = x, x_2 = y$. That gives us: $$ \frac{\partial g}{\partial u} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial u}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\frac{\partial y}{\partial u} $$ We get a completely similar equation for the derivative with resect to $v$.
I now you have to calculate the partial derivatives of $x$ and $y$ with respect to $u$ and $v$ and substitute into the formulas above.
Just in case, I'll mention that in the problem $g_u,$ for example, means $\frac{\partial g}{\partial u}.$
Try it now.