This is an idea that I had about 3 months ago. I tried some college professors, they didn't care. I tried to solve, but with no luck. I ask for help to find the closed form of the following product series. I know it would be safer only to put the product, but I just would like to see this solved, and if I put why I think this is important, the chance of someone helping would be higher.
My idea is:
If $\prod_{k=2}^{X-1}{\sin(\pi\frac{X}k)}≠0$, than the number $X$ is prime. Else, $X$ is a non-prime.
Why:
- $\sin(\pi\frac{X}k)$ tests if a number k divides X. If the value returned is $0$, than k divides X. Because for a number to divide another, the result must be an integer, and $\sin(\pi\alpha)$ is equal to $0$ if and only if $\alpha$ is an integer. So, to test if a number, for example, k=3 divides 9, we could try that like $\sin(\pi\frac{9}3)=\sin(3\pi)=0$. Now let's try to see if 2 divides 11 this way: $\sin(\pi\frac{11}2)=\sin(5.5\pi)=-1≠0$
- Using logic, we could extend this to the product above. We only need one sine being $0$ for the product to be $0$. That means that with only one divisor from range $2$ to $X-1$, the number X is a non-prime. And the only way for the product to be $0$ is if one or more of the sines is $0$: You can't multiply numbers $≠0$ and get $0$.
For example, 7 is prime if: $$\sin(\pi\frac{7}2)\times \sin(\pi\frac{7}3)\times \sin(\pi\frac{7}4)\times \sin(\pi\frac{7}5)\times \sin(\pi\frac{7}6)\ne 0$$ and that's the case.
I know I could test only until $\sqrt{7}$ rounded up, but if someone can get the closed form of the product, that wouldn't matter, and we wouldn't have to calculate the square root.
Thank you for reading this.
Assuming $X$ is an integer $\geq3$ your test is fine from a logical point of view. But it is completely useless if you want to find out whether $X:=63\,176\,591$ is prime. You would need millions of terms of the sine series in order to compute a single factor of your product, say $\sin\bigl(\pi{X\over 31}\bigr)$. But even if you computed all these factors to $10^6$ places, in a numerically unlucky situation you would not be able to decide definitively that the product is $\ne0$.