If $E_1$ of a finite dimensional real inner product space, then every coset of $E/E_1$ contains exactly one vector orthogonal to $E_1$

253 Views Asked by At

In the book of linear algebra by Werner Greub, at page $191$ it is asked that

Given a subspace $E_1$ of a finite dimensional real inner product space $E$, consider the factor space $E/E_1$.Prove that every equivalence class, i.e coset, contains exactly one vector which is orthogonal to $E_1$.

As a proof method, I thought I should first show that every coset contains a orthogonal vector to $E_1$, and then show that this orthogonal vector is unique to the coset.I tried the prove the first step by assuming that there is some coset in $E/E_1$ s.t it doesn't contain a orthogonal vector to $E_1$, but couldn't derive anything useful.

I have also considered the linear function space of $E$, i.e the isomorphism between them, but I couldn't find anything there either.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

7
On BEST ANSWER

Hint: Select an orthonormal basis $\{e_1,e_2,\dots,e_d\}$ of $E_1$. A vector is orthogonal to $E_1$ if and only if it satisfies $$ \langle x, e_i \rangle = 0 \qquad i = 1,\dots,d $$ Now, a coset can be written in the form $$ \{x_0 + e : e \in E_1\} $$ and we see that the desired conclusion is equivalent to saying that the system of equations $$ \langle x_0 + e, e_i \rangle = 0 \qquad i = 1,\dots,d \implies\\ \langle e, e_i \rangle = - \langle x_0, e_i \rangle \qquad i = 1,\dots,d $$ (where $x_0$ is a fixed element of $E$) has a unique solution $e \in E_1$. To put it another way: it is equivalent to show that the operator $f:E_1 \to \Bbb R^d$ given by $$ f(e) = (\langle e, e_1 \rangle,\langle e, e_2 \rangle,\dots,\langle e, e_d \rangle) $$ is an isomorphism.


Even if $\{e_1,\dots,e_d\}$ is an arbitrary basis (not necessarily orthonormal), all of the steps in the above "hint" apply. The slightly tricky aspect now, however, is showing that $f$ is an isomorphism.

Because the spaces are finite dimensional, it suffices to note that $\dim(E_1) = \dim(\Bbb R^d)$, and to show that $\ker(f) = \{0\}$.

Now, suppose that $x \in \ker f$. That is, $\langle x, e_i \rangle = 0$ for all $i$. In order to show that $x = 0$, it suffices to show that $\langle x, y \rangle = 0$ for all $y \in E$. To that end, note that for any $y \in E$, we can select coefficients $\alpha_i$ such that $$ y = \sum_{i=1}^d \alpha_i e_i $$ Conclude that $$ \langle x,y \rangle = \left \langle x, \sum_{i=1}^d \alpha_i e_i \right \rangle = \sum_{i=1}^d \alpha_i \langle x, e_i\rangle = 0 $$

3
On

For existence:

If the coset is $E_1$ itself, then ofcourse $0$ is the unique vector that is orthogonal to $E_1$. If it is not $E_1$ then it is of the from $v+E_1$ for some $v\notin E_1$. Take the projection $Pr_{E_1}(v)$ of $v$ onto $E_1$. Then $v-Pr_{E_1}(v)$ is orthogonal to $E_1$ and still an element of the coset (as $-Pr_{E_1}(v)\in E_1$).

For uniqueness:

Take two such vectors in $v + E_1$, i.e. $v+x \in E_1^\perp$ and $v+y \in E_1^\perp$, where $x,y\in E_1$. Since $E_1^\perp$ is itself a subspace we have that the diffrence of the two vectors is still in there: $$(v+x)-(v+y) = x-y \in E_1^\perp$$ but $x-y$ is also an element of $E_1$ so it must be $0$.