I do have a general proof for this problem. That is if there is a continuous function on a compact interval then the function is uniformly continuous.
But I'm wondering whether there is a different (more simpler one) for this particular domain.
2026-03-26 23:09:46.1774566586
If $f:[0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is continuous then it is uniformly continuous
537 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in CONTINUITY
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Define in which points function is continuous
- Continuity of composite functions.
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Show that f(x) = 2a + 3b is continuous where a and b are constants
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Two Applications of Schwarz Inequality
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Prove $f(x,y)$ is continuous or not continuous.
- proving continuity claims
Related Questions in METRIC-SPACES
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Is the following set open/closed/compact in the metric space?
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
Related Questions in UNIFORM-CONTINUITY
- Given $f:[0,8]\to \mathbb{R}$ be defined by $f(x)=x^{(1/3)}$
- Show that the function $f: x \rightarrow x^2$ is uniformly continuous on the set $S = \bigcup \{[n,n + n^{-2}] ~|~n \in \mathbb N\}$
- Is function is uniformly continuous on $\mathbb{R}$ then it is uniformly continuous on subset of $\mathbb{R}$?
- A sequence of continuous functions that converges uniformly to a continuous function is equicontinuous
- Why can't all pointwise continuous functions preserve Cauchy sequences?
- Uniformly continuous in $(a,b)$ if and only if uniformly continuous in $[a,b]$?
- Can the composition of two non-uniformly continuous functions be uniformly continuous?
- Prove that $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{2^n}\sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^k {n\choose k}f\left(\frac{k}{n} \right)=0$
- How to check uniform continuity on disconnected set
- Proving that $f(x)$ isn't uniformly continuous...
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Wether there is a different or a simpler proof is not the same question. You can find proof for any closed interval of $\mathbb{R}$ that do not explicitly call compactness ( an example is to be found in Michael Spivak's textbook Calculus, as @MathematicsStudent1122 stated in his comment, see page 142 of https://notendur.hi.is/mbh6/html/_downloads/Calculus%20-%20Michael%20Spivak.pdf). But all these proofs are based on the ability to explicitly exhibit a finite open cover for intervals of $\mathbb{R}$, which in the end, is just as strong as calling compactness.
If f is differentiable, then the mean-value theorem will definitely give you a shortcut, but once again, the ability to find an upper bound for the derivative will be based on the compactness of $[0,1]$, wether explicitly or implicitly.
As to know if the above proofs will be simpler, there are some cases in mathematics (more frequent than you would think) where getting more general makes simpler proof. I reckon this is one of these cases. What we can say however, is that not calling explicitly compactness is gonna use less advanced knowledge with regard with a basic cursus in mathematics.