let $f:N^{+}\to Z$,and $f$ is monotonic nondecreasing,and such $$f(m)f(n)=f(mn)+f(m+n-1),f(4)=5$$ Find all $f(n)$
My try: let $$m=2,n=2\Longrightarrow f^2(2)=f(4)+f(3)$$ $$m=1.n=4,f(1)f(4)=f(4)+f(4)\Longrightarrow f(1)=2$$ $$m=2,n=1,f(2)f(1)=f(2)+f(2)\Longrightarrow f(1)=2$$ $$n=1,m=m\Longrightarrow f(m)f(1)=f(m)+f(m)\Longrightarrow f(1)=2$$ $$m=2,n=3,f(2)f(3)=f(6)+f(4)$$ I can't find $f(2)$,
since $$2=f(1)\le f(2)\le f(3)\le f(4)=5$$,then we must $$f(2)=3,f(3)=4$$. but for $n\ge 6$,I can't find it.
and I found $$f(n)=n+1$$ is such it.because $$f(m)f(n)=(m+1)(n+1)=(mn+1)+m+n=f(mn)+f(m+n-1)$$
But I can't prove it.
Thank you
My main idea is to supply a definition of $f(0)$ which is well defined by $$ f(m)f(n)=f(mn)+f(m+n-1)\qquad(1) $$ Now, you have two conditions that $f(1)=2$(you had proof it) and $f(4)=5$. Set $n=0$ in $(1)$, we have: $$ f(0)+f(m-1)=f(m)f(0)\qquad(2) $$ Then, set $m=2,3,4$, we have the following system: $$ f(0)+2=f(2)f(0)\\ f(0)+f(2)=f(3)f(0)\\ f(0)+f(3)=5f(0) $$ There is only one real solution of it, that is $f(0)=1$, $f(2)=3$, $f(3)=4$. Then, we guess that $f(n)=n+1$ and we will prove it by mathematical induction:
Proposition: Under (1), $f(n)=n+1$ for $n\in N$.
Proof:
1.n=0, $f(0)=1$, the proposition is right. 2.If proposition is valid for any $k\in N$, then for $k+1$, from $(2)$, we have: $$ 1+f(k)=f(k+1)\\ f(k+1)=k $$ That is, it is also valid for $k+1$.
Q.E.D. In summary, we have $f(n)=n+1$.
I can prove the conclusion by another way. Firstly, from @Mark Bennet's work, we have $f(1)=2$, $f(2)=3$, $f(3)=4$, $f(4)=5$. We can claim:
The proof also given by mathematical induction.
For $n=1,2,3,4$, the conclusion had been got.
Assuming the proposition is valid for $k\in N^+$, we have the following deduction:
Set $n=2$ and $n=4$ in $(1)$, we have: $$ f(2m)+f(m+1)=3f(m)\qquad(3)\\ f(4m)+f(m+3)=5f(m)\qquad(4) $$ So $f(2k+2)=3f(k+1)-f(k+2)$. When $k>2$, $f(k+1)$ and $f(k+2)$ is known under the assumption that proposition is valid for $k$. So it easy to obtain that $f(2k+2)=2k+3$. That is, i) is valid.
From $(3)$ and $(4)$, we have: $$ 5f(m)-f(m+3)=f(4m)=f(2\times2m)=3f(2m)-f(2m+1)=3(3f(m)-f(m+1))-f(2m+1) $$ Render it in a neat form, we have: $$ 4f(m)-3f(m+1)-f(2m+1)+f(m+3)=0 $$ Similarly, when $k>3$, $f(m+1)$, $f(m+2)$ and $f(m+4)$ are all known. Then from $f(2k+3)=4f(k+1)-3f(k+2)+f(k+4)$ we can easily to check that ii) is also valid. Then we get the desired result.
I would like to point out that this proposition do not include the case that $n=1$, but this case is trivial to prove.