There are many ways that I can prove this. I want to prove using contradiction. The issue is that I have trouble negating the consequent.
I am trying to contradict no container holds at most $1 + \lfloor\frac {m − 1}{n}\rfloor$ objects. This is really weird to interpret. It seems to say a container can hold more than $1 + \lfloor\frac {m − 1}{n}\rfloor$ objects. This is true because a container can hold m objects. This statement seems to be one that should not be contradicted.
Second thought was that each container holds at most $1 + \lfloor\frac {m − 1}{n}\rfloor$ objects. This is easy to contradict because a container can have m objects. I do not think this actually implies the original implication was true, though.
I do not want anyone to prove for me. I want to know if I am contradicting correct thing.
You want the negation of the statement that
$$\text{at least one container holds at least }1+\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}n\right\rfloor\text{ objects}\;.$$
That negation is:
$$\text{no container holds at least }1+\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}n\right\rfloor\text{ objects}\;,$$
i.e.,
$$\text{no container holds }1+\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}n\right\rfloor\text{ or more objects.}$$
This is turn is equivalent to:
$$\text{every container holds fewer than }1+\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}n\right\rfloor\text{ objects.}$$
In other words, if some container holds $k$ objects, then $k<1+\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}n\right\rfloor$. And since the number of objects in a container must be an integer, this means that $k\le\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}n\right\rfloor$. Thus, our negation can be restated as follows:
$$\text{every container holds at most }\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}n\right\rfloor\text{ objects.}$$
Stated in more detail, it is:
$$\text{if a container holds }k\text{ objects, then }k\le\left\lfloor\frac{m-1}n\right\rfloor\;.$$