In the comments section of this question, the original poster raised an interesting variation on the problem, which I will state as follows:
Let $n>1\in\mathbb{N}$. Do there exist $f_1,\dots,f_k\in\mathbb{Z}[x]$ of degree $n$ such that, for any $p$ prime, there exists $i(p)\leqslant k$ with $f_{i(p)}$ irreducible and of degree $n$, mod $p$?
I am nearly certain that, for any $n\in\mathbb{N}$, the answer to this question is no, and I suspect there is probably a solution to this using Dedekind's theorem or some similar tool. However, off the top of my head I am not able to see how such an argument might go in the general case. Can anyone give a proof?
To get the ball rolling, I have written up an elementary proof for the case $n=2$ below. Other proofs for specific values of $n$ are very welcome as well.
Theorem: Let $f_1,\dots,f_k\in\mathbb{Z}[x]$ be polynomials of degree at most $2$. Then there exists a prime $p$ such that each $f_i$ is either reducible or of degree $\leqslant 1$, mod $p$.
Proof: Suppose that $f_i=a_ix^2+b_ix+c_i$ for each $i$. By the quadratic formula, if $a_i$ does not vanish mod $p$, then $f_i$ will have a root mod $p$ ($p>2$) if and only if $b_i^2-4a_ic_i$ is a quadratic residue mod $p$. Thus let $\delta_i=b_i^2-4a_ic_i$ for each $i$. It will suffice to find a prime $p$ such that $\delta_i$ is a quadratic residue mod $p$, for every $i$.
Let $p_1,\dots,p_l$ be all of the odd prime divisors of each $\delta_i$, and consider the system of congruences \begin{align} p\equiv 1&\mod 4 \\ p\equiv 1&\mod p_1 \\ p\equiv 1&\mod p_2 \\ &\vdots \\ p\equiv 1&\mod p_l. \end{align} The collection $\{4,p_1,\dots,p_l\}$ is pairwise coprime by construction, so Sun Zi's theorem tells us that the above system of congruences is equivalent to $p\equiv m\text{ }(\operatorname{mod} 4p_1\dots p_l)$ for some $m\in\mathbb{N}$. Now, $m$ is certainly coprime with $4p_1\dots p_l$, since $m$ is congruent to $1$ mod $4$ and $1$ mod $p_i$, for each $i$. Thus, by Dirichlet's theorem, there exists some $\lambda\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $m+\lambda\cdot 4p_1\dots p_l$ is prime; let $p=m+\lambda\cdot 4p_1\dots p_l$.
By construction, $p$ is congruent to $1$ mod $4$ and $1$ mod $p_i$, for each $i$. In particular, $p$ is a quadratic residue mod $2$ and mod each $p_i$, so, by quadratic reciprocity, $2$ and each $p_i$ are all quadratic residues mod $p$. Similarly, since $p$ is equivalent to $1$ mod $4$, we have that $-1$ is also a quadratic residue mod $p$. By construction, every $\delta_i$ is plus-or-minus a product of powers of $\{2,p_1,\dots,p_l\}$, and so – since products of quadratic residues are quadratic residues – every $\delta_i$ is a quadratic residue mod $p$. This means that each $\overline f_i$ is either linear or reducible, mod $p$, as desired.
You're correct. A negative answer follows from the Frobenius density theorem (a slightly weaker and easier-to-prove version of the Chebotarev density theorem), which is a sort of converse to Dedekind's theorem and which says the following:
Now apply this result to $f = \prod f_i$.
Edit: Several sources you can find by googling only state the Frobenius density theorem for the case that $f$ is irreducible, and for this application we really need the general case; it is stated without the irreducibility assumption, for example, in Lenstra and Stevenhagen's Chebotarev and his density theorem, which I believe is where I first learned about it. I don't think we really need the hypothesis that $f$ is monic either, since the result is really about the splitting field of $f$ anyway; we can just ignore the finitely many primes dividing the leading term since they have density $0$. Similarly here we're ignoring the finitely many primes dividing the discriminant to avoid dealing with the possibility of repeated roots, since they also have density $0$.
Edit #2: I have been very silly. There's an elementary proof of a weaker version of the corollary, totally avoiding any analytic number theory, which suffices for this purpose. I learned this argument from an MO answer by Bjorn Poonen and forgot about it until just now.
Proof. Let $K$ be a splitting field for $f$ over $\mathbb{Q}$, let $\alpha \in \mathcal{O}_K$ be a primitive element for $K$ (so that $K = \mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$), and let $g \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ be the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$. Then, ignoring finitely many primes dividing any denominators that show up, $f(x)$ splits completely $\bmod p$ iff $g(x)$ has a root $\bmod p$ (since by hypothesis every root of $f$ is a polynomial in $\alpha$) iff there exists an integer $k$ such that $p \mid g(k)$.
But the values of every non-constant polynomial in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ are divisible by infinitely many primes; this can be proven using a Euclid-style argument but see also this blog post for a counting argument. (In one sentence: an eventually monotonically increasing sequence of integers divisible by only finitely many primes must grow faster than polynomially.) $\Box$