If we let $\delta < 1$, then why do we set $\delta$ to be the minimum of $1$ and $\frac{\epsilon}{5}$?

165 Views Asked by At

Using $\epsilon$-$\delta$ definition, show that $\lim_{x \to 2} x^{2} = 4$.

The proof according to Example 7: Evaluating a limit using the definition

$|x^{2}-4|<\epsilon \implies |x-2|<\frac{\epsilon}{|x+2|}$

Let $\delta < 1$, then $|x-2|<1$

$-1<x-2<1$

$1<x<3$

$3<x+2<5$

$\frac{1}{5}<\frac{1}{|x+2|}<\frac{1}{3}$

$\frac{\epsilon}{5}<\frac{\epsilon}{|x+2|}<\frac{\epsilon}{3}$

Let $\delta \leq \frac{\epsilon}{5}$, then $|x-2| < \frac{\epsilon}{5}$

$|x^{2}-4| < |x+2|\frac{\epsilon}{5}$

As long as $\delta < 1$, we get:

$|x^{2}-4| < |x+2|\frac{\epsilon}{5}< |x+2|\frac{\epsilon}{|x+2|} $

$|x^{2}-4| < \epsilon$

However, we could have let $\delta \leq 1$, which will make the proof still true. Consider the following two cases:

Case I: $\delta < 1$

$\delta < 1 \implies |x-2|< \delta < 1 \implies |x-2|<1$.

Case II: $\delta \leq 1$

$\delta \leq 1 \implies |x-2|< \delta \leq 1 \implies |x-2|<1$ for either $\delta < 1$ and $\delta = 1$

Thus, $\delta \leq \frac{\epsilon}{5} \leq 1 $

Furthermore, the source states:

For the final fix, we set $\delta$ to be the minimum of $1$ and $\frac{\epsilon}{5}$. This way all caculations above work.

This would mean $\delta \leq min(1, \frac{\epsilon}{5})$ since, by definition, a smaller $\delta$ such as $0<|x-a|<\delta^{'}<\delta$ will imply that $|f(x)-L| < \epsilon$ and that $1$ or $\frac{\epsilon}{5}$ will satisfy the implication depending on $\epsilon$. Therefore, we can have $\delta \leq 1$

Question

In summary, is it better to start off with $\delta \leq 1$ over $\delta < 1$, right?