Let
- $E$ be an at most countable Polish space and $\mathcal E$ be the discrete topology on $E$
- $X=(X_t)_{t\ge 0}$ be a discrete Markov process with values $(E,\mathcal E)$ and distributions $(\operatorname P_x)_{x\in E}$
Claim$\;\;\;$Let $$\operatorname p_t(x,y):=\operatorname P_x\left[X_t=y\right]\;\;\;\text{for }x,y\in E\text{ and }t\ge 0\;.$$ If $X$ is right-continuous, then $$\lim_{t\downarrow 0}p_t(x,x)=1\;.\tag 1$$
How can we prove the claim? I've tried the following: Let $$\tau:=\inf\left\{s>0:X_s\ne X_0\right\}$$ and $x\in E$. Clearly, since $\operatorname P_x$-almost surely $X_0=x$, $$\operatorname P_x\left[\tau>t\right]=\operatorname P_x\left[X_s=X_0\text{ for all }s\in (0,t]\right]\le p_t(x,x)\;\;\;\text{for all }t>0\;.\tag 2$$ Two questions:
- How exactly does the right-continuity of $X$ imply $$\tau>0\;\;\;\operatorname P_x\text{-almost surely}\tag 3$$ for all $x\in E$?
- Why can we conclude $(1)$ from $(2)$ and $(3)$?
Here is a proof by contradiction:
Suppose that $p_t(x,x)$ does not converge to $1$ as $t\downarrow 0$ . Then there exist a sequence of times $t_n \downarrow 0$ and an $\epsilon >0$ such that $p_{t_n}(x,x)\le 1- \epsilon$ for all $n$.
Moreover, the latter implies, by taking complements, that $P_x(X_{t_n}\ne x) \ge \epsilon$ for all $n$. As the space is discrete, I'll assume the discrete topology, so that $X_{t_n}\ne x$ implies that $X_{t_n}$ lies outside the fixed neighborhood $V=\{x\}$ of $x$.
Now, by the reverse Fatou lemma, $$ \epsilon \le \limsup_n P_x(X_{t_n}\ne x) \le P_x(\limsup_n\{X_{t_n}\ne x\}) = P_x\{X_{t_n}\not \in V \text{ for infinitely many }t_n\},$$
and this implies that, with probability at least $\epsilon$, $X_{t_n}\overset{n}{\not \to} x$, contradicting the right continuity claim.