I'm doing my PhD about some topological constructions for Right-angled Artin groups. While trying to prove a lemma about word lengths in this kind of groups, I arrived to this inequality involving factorials: $$ a!+(n-a-1)!+b!+(n-b-1)!\geq (a-c)!+(n-a+c-1)!+(b-c)!+(n-b+c-1)! $$ where $A,B\subset L$, $n=|L|$ is the cardinal of the set and $a=|A|,b=|B|, c=|A\cap B|\neq 0$. I've been a couple of days thinking about it, but the only thing that occurs to me is trying to prove $$ a!-(a-c)!\geq (n-a+c-1)!-(n-a-1)! $$ but I don't really know how to simplify any expression in there. It's been a while since the last time I worked with factorials and combinatorics. Do you think the inequality will hold? Do you have any idea about how could I start working on it? Thank you very much!
2026-04-02 10:09:09.1775124549
Inequality involving factorials
69 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMBINATORICS
- Using only the digits 2,3,9, how many six-digit numbers can be formed which are divisible by 6?
- The function $f(x)=$ ${b^mx^m}\over(1-bx)^{m+1}$ is a generating function of the sequence $\{a_n\}$. Find the coefficient of $x^n$
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Hard combinatorial identity: $\sum_{l=0}^p(-1)^l\binom{2l}{l}\binom{k}{p-l}\binom{2k+2l-2p}{k+l-p}^{-1}=4^p\binom{k-1}{p}\binom{2k}{k}^{-1}$
- Algebraic step including finite sum and binomial coefficient
- nth letter of lexicographically ordered substrings
- Count of possible money splits
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- A certain partition of 28
- Counting argument proof or inductive proof of $F_1 {n \choose1}+...+F_n {n \choose n} = F_{2n}$ where $F_i$ are Fibonacci
Related Questions in INEQUALITY
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- Solution to a hard inequality
- Is every finite descending sequence in [0,1] in convex hull of certain points?
- Bound for difference between arithmetic and geometric mean
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- How to prove that $\pi^{e^{\pi^e}}<e^{\pi^{e^{\pi}}}$
- Proving a small inequality
Related Questions in FACTORIAL
- How is $\frac{\left(2\left(n+1\right)\right)!}{\left(n+1\right)!}\cdot \frac{n!}{\left(2n\right)!}$ simplified like that?
- Remainder of $22!$ upon division with $23$?
- What is the name of this expression?
- How to compute $\left(\frac{n-1}{2}\right)!\pmod{n}$ fast?
- Proving $\sum_{k=1}^n kk!=(n+1)!−1$
- How do we know the Gamma function Γ(n) is ((n-1)!)?
- Approximate value of $15!$
- Limit of a Sequence involving factorials
- How to understand intuitively the fact that $\log(n!) = n\log(n) - n + O(\log(n))$?
- Deriving the fact that the approximation $\log(n!) \approx n\log(n) - n + \frac{1}{2}\log(2\pi n)$ is $O(1/n)$.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The inequality is equivalent to the inequality $a+b-c \ge n-1$, or in other words $|A \cup B| \ge n-1$. I've checked this experimentally for all $n \le 10$, and for $n>10$, we can prove that it continues to hold.
The intuition is that in a sum of factorials, the largest factorial will dominate, unless all the factorials are small. So we deal with the small cases by asking Mathematica to do it, and we deal with the other cases by comparing the largest term on each side.
Case 1. Suppose $a+b-c > n-1$; in particular, $a+b \ge n$. Let's suppose without loss of generality that $a \ge b$; then $a \ge n/2$. We have:
Then just the $a!$ term on the left is greater than each term on the right individually, so they are each at most $(a-1)!$. Because $a \ge n/2 > 5$, we know that $a! > 4(a-1)!$, and just the $a!$ on the left exceeds all the terms on the right.
Case 2. Suppose $a + b - c = n-1$. Then the left and right terms can be paired up into four equal pairs:
In this case, both sides of the inequality are equal.
Case 3. Suppose $a+b-c < n-1$. Again, without loss of generality suppose that $a \ge b$. Then we expect $(n-b+c-1)!$ on the right to dominate all four terms on the left. We have:
But why should $n-b+c-1$ be large? Well, $b-c = |B-A|$, so $n-b+c = n-|B-A|$. Because $a \ge b$, we have $|A-B| \ge |B-A|$, and these are disjoint, so in particular, $|B-A| \le n/2$. Therefore $n-b+c \ge n/2$, so $n-b+c-1 \ge n/2 - 1 > 4$. This is enough to see that four factorials less than $(n-b+c-1)!$ add up to less than $(n-b+c-1)!$, so the right-hand side wins.