Let $n \in \mathbb N^*$, $p \in [1,\infty]$, $\alpha > 0$, $\beta \ge 1$, and $r \ge 0$. For $x \in \mathbb R^n$, let $B_{n,p}(x;r) := \{x' \in \mathbb R^n \mid \|x'-x\|_p \le r\}$ be the $\ell_p$-ball around $x$ of radius $r \ge 0$ in $\mathbb R^n$.
Question. What is the value of $u(n,p,r,\alpha,\beta) := \int_{B_{n,p}(x;r)}e^{-\frac{1}{\alpha}\|x'-x\|_p^{\beta}}dx'$ ?
I will write the justification for exchanging the differentiation and integration that @Ciaran mentioned in the comments; I think that is the best way to prove the formula you wrote in the comments, namely:
$$\int_{B_{n,p}(r)} e^{-\|x \|_p} dx = \omega_{n,p} \int_0^r ns^{n-1} e^{-s} ds$$
where $\omega_{n,p}(r)$ is the $\ell_p$-ball of radius $r$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$
We can argue that the integral above is a function of $r$, so we define
$$ f(r) = \int_{B_{n,p}(r)} e^{-\|x \|_p} dx $$.
Now, we try to compute the derivative, so we first compute an upper and a lower bound on the quotient $ f'(r,\epsilon) = \frac{f(r+\epsilon) - f(r)}{\epsilon}$ to make sure that the derivative exists. Here, we can use the monotonicity of the integrand to argue that
$$ \frac{ (\omega_{n,p}(r + \epsilon) - \omega_{n,p}(r)) e^{-r}}{\epsilon} \geq f'(r, \epsilon) \geq \frac{(\omega_{n,p}(r+\epsilon) - \omega_{n,p}(r))e^{-(r + \epsilon)}}{\epsilon}$$
Now, for both sides of the inequality, the limit as $\epsilon$ goes to $0$ is well-defined (we use the continuity of $e^{-r}$ as a funciton or $r \ge 0$, and that $\omega_{n,p}(r) = r^n \omega_{n,p}(1)$, which is also a continuous function of $r \ge 0$) , we get that the derivative $f'(s)$ is well-defined and is equal to
$$f'(s) = n\omega_{n,p}(1) s^{n-1} e^{-s} $$
and the result now follows from fundamental theorem of calculus.
(An alternate approach is to use the layer-cake decomposition; it works just fine (that is how I first did it), though it is a bit longer I think, and I had to use integration by parts to show that the two expressions were equal)