I understand the definition of the adjoint representation of a Lie group. But why is that important? In particular, why is it a natural choice of group representation?
2026-03-29 23:45:47.1774827947
Intuition/Significance of adjoint representation of a Lie group
1.1k Views Asked by user242708 https://math.techqa.club/user/user242708/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in INTUITION
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Intuition for $\int_Cz^ndz$ for $n=-1, n\neq -1$
- Intuition on Axiom of Completeness (Lower Bounds)
- What is the point of the maximum likelihood estimator?
- Why are functions of compact support so important?
- What is it, intuitively, that makes a structure "topological"?
- geometric view of similar vs congruent matrices
- Weighted average intuition
- a long but quite interesting adding and deleting balls problem
- What does it mean, intuitively, to have a differential form on a Manifold (example inside)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In case you prefer math intuitive and non-technical like me, I have summarized my thoughts on your question. I also very recommend to look at the links in @Dietrich Burde´s comment.
With adjoint representation, we can look at the elements of the Lie group (let´s call it $G$) as at linear transformations of its Lie algebra (let´s call it $\mathfrak{g}$). But why and how?
For me, this is a problem that is common in math. We have a group $G$ with some abstract elements. Recall that any Lie group $G$ is also a manifold, so the elements live in some wiggly curved space. Of course, we would like to move everything into some more pleasant space where we can perform more magic. Ideally, a vector space, because working on vector spaces is just easier.
So, to "move" the elements of $G$ into the world of vectors, we want to represent them as matrices that act on a vector space.
But how do we even start with this? We need to decide how to represent the elements of $G$, ideally in an easy and natural way.
The fact that every Lie group $G$ is a manifold whose elements satisfy the group axioms tells us that $G$ looks in the neighborhood of any point (= any group element) like $\mathbb{R}^n$.
Now recall that the Lie algebra of a group is defined as the tangent space at the identity element $e$ of $G$. Denote this tangent space $T_eG$. Lie algebras are important, because a curved object which is the Lie group $G$, a Lie group G, can be quite nicely described by a flat object, which is the Tangent space $T_eG$ of $G$ at the identity $e$.”
So, we got from $G$ to a vector space $T_eG$.
Are there more possible vector spaces which can be used for representation of $G$? Of course. We can look at representations of a given group on any vector space. (There is even a theorem saying that every Lie algebra is isomorphic to a matrix Lie algebra. This means that the knowledge of ordinary linear algebra is enough to study Lie algebras because every Lie algebra can be viewed as a set of matrices.)
However, there is exactly one distinguished vector space that comes automatically with each group: Its own Lie algebra. And this representation on the Lie algebra is called the adjoint representation.
I hope this helps to understand, why adjoint representation is precisely the natural choice.