In context of principal component analysis, I am using the Eigenvectors of the Covariance matrix to project the data.
I am able to prove that the Eigenvector of the Covariance Matrix is the direction of the greatest variance in the original data. However I am wondering, is there is an intuitive explanation for this fact?
2026-04-03 12:56:34.1775220994
Intuition why Eigenvector of Covariance matrix points into direction of maximum variance
2.8k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in EIGENVALUES-EIGENVECTORS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Show that this matrix is positive definite
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Evaluating a cubic at a matrix only knowing only the eigenvalues
- Eigenvalues of $A=vv^T$
- A minimal eigenvalue inequality for Positive Definite Matrix
- Construct real matrix for given complex eigenvalues and given complex eigenvectors where algebraic multiplicity < geometric multiplicity
Related Questions in COVARIANCE
- Let $X, Y$ be random variables. Then: $1.$ If $X, Y$ are independent and ...
- Correct formula for calculation covariances
- How do I calculate if 2 stocks are negatively correlated?
- Change order of eigenvalues and correspoding eigenvector
- Compute the variance of $S = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N X_i$, what did I do wrong?
- Bounding $\text{Var}[X+Y]$ as a function of $\text{Var}[X]+\text{Var}[Y]$
- covariance matrix for two vector-valued time series
- Calculating the Mean and Autocovariance Function of a Piecewise Time Series
- Find the covariance of a brownian motion.
- Autocovariance of a Sinusodial Time Series
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, the way I captured this is:
Nature has no metric system in itself, so when you measure something, you're doing it through a super-imposed metric that does not, in principle, have any meaning
However, one could measure things in a "more natural way" taking the distance from the mean divided by the standard deviation, let me explain this to you with an example
Suppose you see a man which is 2.10 meters tall, we all would say that he is a very tall man, not because of the digits "2.10" but because (unconsciously) we know that the average height of a human being is (I'm making this up) 1.80m and the standard deviation is 8cm, so that this individual is "3.75 standard deviations far from the mean"
Now suppose you go to Mars and see an individual which is 6 meters tall, and a scientist tells you that the average height of martians is 5.30 meters, would you conclude that this indidual is "exceptionally tall"? The answer is: it depends on the variability! (i.e. the standard deviation)
So that, one natural way measure things is the so called Mahalanobis distance
$$\Sigma \text{ be a positive def. matrix (in our case it will be the covariance matrix)} \quad d(x,\mu)=(x-\mu)^T\Sigma^{-1}(x-\mu) $$
This mean that the contour levels (in the euclidean rappresentation) of the distance of points $X_i$ from their mean $\mu$ are ellipsoid whose axes are the eigenvector of the matrix $\Sigma$ and the lenght of the axes is proportional to the eigenvalue associated with eigenvector
So that to larger eigenvalue is associated longer axis (in the euclidean distance!) which means more variability in that direction