After looking at it for a while it seems quite a hard problem. I am not an expert in the area, but I have the impression that it might me an open problem.
2026-03-25 16:45:42.1774457142
On
Is $3^{\log_{10}(3)}$ irrational?
160 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
0
On
According to Alan Baker (A concise introduction to the theory of numbers), Lindemann proved in his proof of the trascendance of $\pi$, several other facts, in particular the trascendance of $\log(\alpha)$ for algebraic $\alpha\ne0,1$.(this theorem says: For algebraic numbers, distinct, $\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\cdots,\alpha_n$ and arbitrary algebraic numbers $\beta_1,\beta_2,\cdots,\beta_n$ distinct of zero, one has $\sum\beta_ie^{\alpha_i}\ne0$).
Taking this into account $\log 3$ is trascendent and to $x=3^{\log(3)}$ does not apply Gelfond-Schneider theorem. As far as I know $x$ can be rational (even integer) or irrational algebraic or trascendent if we want to apply the known theory.
This would follow from Schanuel's conjecture. It implies in particular that there are no "non-obvious" algebraic relations between logarithms of algebraic numbers.
Assume that $3^{\log_{10} 3}= r$, with $r$ algebraic. Then we would have $$\frac{\log r}{\log 3}=\frac{\log 3}{\log 10}$$ that is, $$(\log 3)^2 = \log r \log 10$$
Now, $\log r$ would have to be a rational combination of $\log 3$, $\log 10$, so this implies an algebraic relation between $\log 3$ and $\log 10$, not possible.