Is it possible that in a pyramid ABCD ∠BAC=∠CAD=60° and ∠BAD=120°? If it's impossible it would be great if you would prove it.
2026-04-10 04:41:51.1775796111
Is it possible that in a pyramid ABCD ∠BAC=∠CAD=60° and ∠BAD=120°?
59 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is impossible. Three vectors emanating from vertex $A$ are $\overrightarrow {AB}$ , $\overrightarrow {AC}$ and $\overrightarrow {AD}$ which we denote unit vectors in their directions by $v_1$ , $v_2$ and $v_3$ respectively. Showing $\vec v_1$ , $\vec v_2$ and $\vec v_3$ are coplanar is equivalent to show that: $$\vec v_1.(\vec v_2 \times \vec v_3)=0$$ where $|\vec v_1|=|\vec v_2|=|\vec v_3|=1$. The angle between two vectors $\vec a$ and $\vec b$ can be found using $\cos\theta=\frac{\vec a . \vec b}{|\vec a||\vec b|}$ therefore by appropriate substitution due to our problem we have: $$\vec v_1.\vec v_2=\frac{1}{2}\\ \vec v_1.\vec v_3=\frac{1}{2}\\\vec v_2.\vec v_3=-\frac{1}{2}$$ Since rotation is isometry we can arbitrarily take $\vec v_1=\hat i$ where $\hat i$ is unit vector along $x-axis$. Therefore by substituting $\vec v_1=(1,0,0)$ , $\vec v_2=(v_{2x},v_{2y},v_{2z})$ and $\vec v_3=(v_{3x},v_{3y},v_{3z})$ we obtain:$$v_{2x}=v_{3x}=\frac{1}{2} \\ v_{2y}v_{3y}+v_{2z}v_{3z}=-\frac{3}{4}$$ or $$2v_{2y}v_{3y}+2v_{2z}v_{3z}=-\frac{3}{2}$$ and knowing that $v_{2y}^2+v_{2z}^2=\frac{3}{4}$ and $v_{3y}^2+v_{3z}^2=\frac{3}{4}$ we get: $$v_{2y}^2+v_{2z}^2+v_{3y}^2+v_{3z}^2+2v_{2y}v_{3y}+2v_{2z}v_{3z}=0$$ or $$(v_{2y}+v_{3y})^2+(v_{2z}+v_{3z})^2=0$$ which implies that: $$v_{2y}=-v_{3y} \\ v_{2z}=-v_{3z}$$ Now for calculating $\vec v_1.(\vec v_2 \times \vec v_3)$ we can write: $$\vec v_1.(\vec v_2 \times \vec v_3)=v_{2y}v_{3z}-v_{3y}v_{2z}$$ that equals to zero by substitution and implies on impossibility of existence of such pyramid.