I don't think so, because it is never $aRb$ nor $bRa$ and it is never $aRa$ or $bRb$, thus it is always false, but I don't know if I understood what antisymmetric means exactly.
2026-04-23 06:33:49.1776926029
Is the relation $x+3y = 0$ antisymmetric for all real numbers?
181 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DISCRETE-MATHEMATICS
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- The function $f(x)=$ ${b^mx^m}\over(1-bx)^{m+1}$ is a generating function of the sequence $\{a_n\}$. Find the coefficient of $x^n$
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Solving discrete recursion equations with min in the equation
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
Related Questions in RELATIONS
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Is a relation on which every element is related with itself alone transitive?
- Relation power composition
- Order relation proof
- Order relation proof ...
- How to identify if a given Hasse diagram is a lattice
- Is the relation < a strict total order?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Finding all reflexive binary relations of a set
- Showing that a relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$\,\mathcal{R}\,$ is antisymmetric if and only if, for all $a, b\in \mathbb{R},$ whenever both $ a\,\mathcal{R}\, b\,$ and $b \mathcal{R} a$, then it must be the case that $a=b$.
Let $a, b\in \mathbb{R}$ and define $R$ such that $a \,R \,b$ if and only if $a + 3b = 0$. $$a\,R\, b \;\text{ and}\;\; b \,R \,a \implies a + 3 b = 0 \,\text{ and}\;\, b + 3a = 0.$$ $$\iff a + 3b = b + 3a$$ $$\iff -2a = -2b$$ $$\iff a=b.$$
Therefore, $\forall a, b \in \mathbb{R},\;a \, R \, b \;\text{ and}\;\; b \,R \,a \implies a=b.$
So the relation IS antisymmetric on $\mathbb{R}$ for all real numbers since for $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$ IF both $\,a \,\mathcal{R} \,b\,$ and $\,b\, \mathcal{R} \,a$, then $a = b$.
The fact that there are no pairs $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$ other than $a = b = 0$ where both $\,a\, \mathcal{R} \,b\,$ and $\,b \,\mathcal{R} \,a\,$ doesn't matter. All that matters when determining whether a relation is antisymmtric, is that if and when it happens to be the case that there are $a, b$ such that both $\,a\,\mathcal{R} \,b\,$ AND $\,b\,\mathcal{R}\, a\,$ then it must follow that $a=b$.
In short, the relation is antisymmetric.
Edit, added for clarification in response to comments:
Note that antisymmetric is not the opposite of symmetric (the term is misleading in that sense).