Is the second partial derivative test, $f_{xx}=0$, inconclusive? If yes, I am confused as to why my textbook says this function:
$$f(x,y)=x^2+y^2+x^2y+4$$
Has a minimum point at $(0,0)$. When I use the test, It ends up as $D=4>0$ and $f_{xx}=0$, so how I am supposed to get to the conclusion it is a minimum point?
Apparently this was your first question. So well done! MSE can be intimidating at first.
Well $f_{xx}=2+2y$, so $f_{xx}(0,0)=2>0$.
There is quite a reasonable Wikipedia article on the test.
You probably made an error calculating $f_{xx}$. I am afraid you were not helped by the initial edit carried out for you on the question. But then your original question was a little confusing. Good formatting really helps!
Incidentally, this function also illustrates the dangers of math software. Here is a plot from Mathematica:
At a quick glance it looks as though it might be a saddle point. But if you look closely, maybe not. But if you do a 2D plot along any line through the origin, it has a minimum at the origin (not that that is conclusive).
If you need further help please comment below this answer.