Let $\mathcal{P}_2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ be the set of all probability measures with finite second moment. Let $\mathcal{P}_2^*(\mathbb{R}^n)$ be the subset of $\mathcal{P}_2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ such that any element $\mu \in \mathcal{P}_2^*(\mathbb{R}^n)$ can be represented by $\mu=\nu(x)dx$ where $\mu \geq0$. Consider $\mathcal{P}_2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ and $\mathcal{P}_2^*(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with Wasserstein 2-distance, is $\mathcal{P}_2^*(\mathbb{R}^n)$ dense in $\mathcal{P}_2(\mathbb{R}^n)$? Thank you!!
2026-02-23 06:40:53.1771828853
Is the space of probability measure dense in the space of probability measure with density?
52 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in WASSERSTEIN
- Can we bound the L1 distance between densities by Wasserstein distance of measures
- Why does it suffice to define the homogeneous projection operator by only testing with continuous instead of measurable functions?
- Optimal Transport between two Gaussians
- Wasserstein-1 distance, $W(A\cdot B \| C\cdot D)=W(A \| C) + W(B \| D)$
- Advection reaction equation is solved by projection of solution of continuity equation
- Scaling property of the Wasserstein metric
- An inequality about the 2-Wasserstein distance
- Wasserstein distance inequality
- Wasserstein distance between a distribution of a random variable and the distribution of its projection onto a subset of its sample space
- Relationship between optimal transport and gaussian kernel
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes.
Let $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$. Let $X$ be a random variable following $\mu$, and $X_0$ be a fixed square-integrable random variable independent of $X$ with density $p_0$. You can easily find disjoint measurable sets $A_1,\cdots,A_n$ each with diameter smaller than $\varepsilon$ such that $\mu(A_1\cup\cdots\cup A_n)\ge1-\varepsilon$. Let $A_0=\mathbb R^n\backslash(A_1\cup\cdots\cup A_n)$, and for $i\in\{1,\cdots,n\}$ let $X_i$ be a random variable independent of $X$ and uniformly distributed on $A_i$. Therefore $X_i$ has a density, which we denote $p_i$. Then define $$ Y=\sum_{i=0}^nX_i1_{\{X\in A_i\}}. $$
The random variable $Y$ follows a distribution $\mu'$ which has a density, namely $\sum_{i=0}^n\mu(A_i)p_i$. And $$ \begin{align*} \mathcal W_2^2(\mu,\mu')&\le\mathbb E[\vert X-Y\vert^2]\\ &=\mathbb E[1_{\{X\in A_0\}}\vert X-X_0\vert^2]+\sum_{i=1}^n\mathbb E[1_{\{X\in A_i\}}\vert X-X_i\vert^2]\\&\le\Vert X-X_0\Vert_{L^2}\varepsilon+\varepsilon^2, \end{align*} $$ which proves the density of $\mathcal P_2^*(\mathbb R^n)$ in $\mathcal P_2(\mathbb R^n)$.