A normal function is an increasing function $F\colon \mathrm{Ord} \to \mathrm{Ord}$ where for limit $\alpha$, $F(\alpha) = \sup_{\beta < \alpha} F(\beta)$. Every normal function has arbitrarily large fixed points, and enumerating them makes a new normal function. Examples of normal functions are $\alpha \mapsto \omega^\alpha, \alpha \mapsto \epsilon_\alpha, \alpha \mapsto \omega_\alpha$. The first two maps preserves cardinality for infinite ordinals, easily proved with $\mathsf{AC}$ because successor step preserves cardinality, and without $\mathsf{AC}$ because they are absolute between $L$ and $V$. It follows that they fix uncountable cardinals. But there are non-cardinal fixed points, for example $\epsilon_0$ for the first. Is there a normal function where the set of infinite cardinals, or some tail segment of it is exactly the fixed points?
2026-04-06 15:03:38.1775487818
Is there a normal function where infinite cardinals are exactly the fixed points?
151 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in CARDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- If $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal then $\kappa^{<\kappa} = \max\{\kappa, 2^{<\kappa}\}$
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- On finding enough rationals (countable) to fill the uncountable number of intervals between the irrationals.
- Is the set of cardinalities totally ordered?
- Show that $n+\aleph_0=\aleph_0$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- What is the cardinality of a set of all points on a line?
- Better way to define this bijection [0,1) to (0,1)
Related Questions in ORDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- For each cardinal number $u$, there exists a smallest ordinal number $\alpha$ such that card$\alpha$ =$u$ .
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- Set membership as a relation on a particular set
- Goodstein's sequences and theorem.
- A proof of the simple pressing down lemma, is sup $x=x?$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- Difficulty in understanding cantor normal form
- What are $L_1$ and $L_2$ in the Gödel Constructible Hierarchy
- How many subsets are produced? (a transfinite induction argument)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No.
Suppose that $\omega_1$ is a fixed point of some function $F(\alpha)$, then $F(\omega_1)=\omega_1$. Since the function is normal, that means that $\alpha<\omega_1$ implies that $F(\alpha)<\omega_1$ as well.
But now we can show that there is a club of fixed points below $\omega_1$. The same holds for any uncountable cofinality.
One way around this would be to consider a model of $\sf ZF$ in which every infinite ordinal has countable cofinality, but off the cuff that's not going to work either since it will require you to identify a countable cofinal sequence in each ordinal, which seems like a bit more choice than what you'd usually have.1
That's not to say that it's inconsistent or impossible. It may very well be doable. You'd still need to come up with that definition, though. Probably if $\alpha_n$ is the cofinal sequence up to $\omega_\alpha$, you'd like to have something like $F(\xi)$ to be the least $\alpha_n$ above $\xi$ (in the appropriate interval), and the identity on the cardinals.
But frankly, that seems like we're trying too hard.