Is there a rigorous mathematical definition of the Koch curve? Wikipedia says that mathematics is not given a rigorous formal definition of a fractal in general. And also I have not found a strict definition of the Koch curve. Everywhere write "go to the limit of the curves." But what is the formal definition of the limit of the curves?
2025-01-12 23:56:09.1736726169
Is there a rigorous mathematical definition of the Koch curve?
270 Views Asked by Stanislav Morozov https://math.techqa.club/user/stanislav-morozov/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DEFINITION
- Why not generalize the Intermediate Value Theorem
- What does it mean to 'preserve the first fundamental form'?
- Proving definition of directional derivative $\lim_{s \to 0} \frac{f(a + sx) - f(a)}{s} = f'(a)x$
- Why is the derivative used to represent marginal cost instead of the difference?
- $\epsilon$ - $\delta$ definition of a limit - smaller $\epsilon$ implies smaller $\delta$?
- Basis-Independent Definition of Gradient of Multivector Fields
- Clarify the definition of a transition matrix
- What is the definition of sequential precompactness?
- What is randomness?
- The equivalence of open-set definition of continuous mappings to the $\epsilon-\delta$ definition
Related Questions in FRACTALS
- Relations between the 2-disc operad and fractals?
- Proving that we have $A \subset K$ where $K$ is self-similar
- On a curve every point of which is a point of ramification
- How to avoid overlap in circle fractals?
- Non-empty interior of a Mandelbox
- Is there a rigorous mathematical definition of the Koch curve?
- Definition of Minkowski dimension
- Are there methods to recursively calculate the decimal expansion of real numbers?
- Cantor set and ternary expansions
- Union of two Cantor sets is also a Cantor set
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
The rigorous definition means that you have to use a consistent parameterization for each step in the construct. What we do to achieve this is to keep the first third and last third of each segment intact and replace the middle third. So in complex plane we start with the parameterization:
$$\gamma_0(t) = t$$
Then the step is done by replacing the middle segments. This is most easily done by adding a perpendicular offset. To do this we just put
$$\gamma_{n+1}(t) = \gamma_n(t) + i\gamma_n'(t)\phi(3^nt)3^{-n}$$
where the derivative is taken to be one sided (we will anyway have to rely on $\phi(3^nt)=0$ in the corner ponts of $\gamma$) and $\phi$ is a function for the perpendicular offset:
$$\phi(t) = \begin{cases} \sqrt{3}(t-n-1/3) & \mbox{if } n+1/3 \le t \le n+1/2 \\ -\sqrt{3}(t-n-2/3) & \mbox{if } n+1/2 < t \le n+2/3 \\ 0 & \mbox{otherwise} \end{cases}$$
Now we have a sequence of functions $\gamma_n$ and have to make some things certain as we are to define the Koch curve as $\gamma(t) = \lim_{n\to\infty}\gamma_n(t)$.
First of all we have to show that $\gamma_n(t)$ is continuous which should be rather straight forward. We use that $\gamma_n'(t)$ is continuous (actually constant) whenever $\phi(3^nt)\ne0$.
We also should prove that $|\gamma_{n+1}(t)-\gamma_n(t)|<(2/3)^n$ which would guarantee that $\gamma(t) = \lim_{n\to\infty}\gamma_n(t)$ is defined at all, but also that it converges uniformly and therefore $\gamma(t)$ is continuous as well.
$$\gamma_{n+1}(t)-\gamma_n(t) = i\gamma_n'(t)\phi(3^nt)3^{-n}$$
in order to estimate this we need an estimate of the derivative:
$$|\gamma_{n+1}'(t)|= |\gamma_n'(t) + i\gamma_n''(t)\phi(3^nt)3^{-n} + i\gamma_n'(t)\phi'(3^nt)| = |\gamma_n'(t) (1 + i\phi'(3^nt))| < 2|\gamma_n'(t)|$$
This means that $|\gamma_n'(t)|<2^n$ inserting it
$$|\gamma_{n+1}(t)-\gamma_n(t)| = |i\gamma_n'(t)\phi(3^nt)3^{-n}| < 2^n|\phi(3^nt)|3^{-n} < (2/3)^n$$