If $\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{S}^{n-1})$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$. Can we always find a measurable mapping $f:\mathbb{S}^{n-1}\to\mathbb{S}^{n-1}$ such that $\mu=f\#\nu$, or equivalently $$\int_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}} gd\mu=\int_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}} gd(f\#\nu)=\int_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}} g\circ fd\nu$$ where $f\#\nu$ stands for the push-forward and $g\in\mathcal{L}^1(\mathbb{S}^{n-1})$? If not, what are the sufficient conditions for it to be true?
2026-03-26 02:50:25.1774493425
Is there always a mapping between probability measures on the $n$-sphere?
142 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in PUSHFORWARD
- Equality Proof of Pushforward and Pullback
- Basic question about related vector fields and pushforwards
- Finding the components of a pushforward vector in local coordinates
- Calculating push forwards of a vector field
- Push-forward and Category theory
- Blow up of $\mathbb{P}^2$ in a point and direct image sheaves
- On the $\pi$-induced pushforward of a tensor field on $TM$
- partial derivatives and chain rule of functions defined on manifold
- Push-forward of a measure from $\mathbb{R}^d$ to $\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbb{R}^d$
- Pushforward formula for Lebesgue Stieltjes Measure
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First note that the $d$-dimensional sphere $S^d$ with its standard topology is a standard measurable space. Call a Borel probability measure $\mu$ on $S^d$ continuous if $\forall x\in S^d: \mu(\{x\})=0$. Then we have the following abstract isomorphism theorem:
Theorem: Let $(X,\mathcal{B}(X))$ be a standard measurable space and for any continuous Borel probability measure $\mu$ on $(X,\mathcal{B}(X))$, there is a bimeasurable $f: (X,\mathcal{B}(X))\to ([0,1],\mathcal{B}([0,1]))$ such that $f_\ast(\mu)=\operatorname{leb}_{[0,1]}$.
(See e.g. Kechris' Classical Descriptive Set Theory, p.116, Thm.17.41 for a proof.)
(By bimeasurable I mean an isomorphism in the category of measurable spaces; so that $f:X\to Y$ is bimeasurable iff it's a measurable bijection with measurable inverse.)
Next, observe that any Borel probability measure $\mu$ on $S^d$, there are at most countably many points $x_{\mu,\bullet}:\mathbb{Z}_{\geq1}\to S^d$ such that $\mu(\{x_{\mu,n}\})=c_{\mu,n}>0$; and putting $D_\mu=\{x_{\mu,n}\,|\, n\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq1}\}\subset S^d$ and $C_\mu=S^d\setminus D_\mu$, we have that
$$\mu=\mu(C_\mu)\mu(\bullet\,|\, C_\mu)+\mu(D_\mu)\mu(\bullet\,|\, D_\mu),$$
with $\mu(\bullet\,|\, C_\mu)$ a continuous Borel probability measure on $S^d$ and $\mu(\bullet\,|\, D_\mu)=\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z_{\geq1}}}c_{\mu,n}\delta_{x_{\mu,n}}$ . By checking against characteristic functions of singletons, it's straightforward that if $f:S^d\to S^d$ is bimeasurable, then $f_\ast(c_{\mu,n}\delta_{x_{\mu,n}})=c_{\mu,n}\delta_{f(x_{\mu,n})}$; thus the discrete part of a measure is term-wise preserved under bimeasurable maps . Putting all this together we obtain:
Corollary: For any two Borel probability measures $\mu,\nu$ on $S^d$, there is a bimeasurable $g:S^d\to S^d$ such that $g_\ast(\mu)=\nu$ iff there is a bijection $\beta: \mathbb{Z}_{\geq1}\to\mathbb{Z}_{\geq1}$ such that $x_{\mu,n}=x_{\nu,\beta(n)}$ and $c_{\mu,n}=c_{\nu,\beta(n)}$.
Note that bimeasurability is necessary for this; e.g. a constant map pushes forward any measure to the Dirac delta at the point that is its image.