I saw a lot of examples of varieties which are rational, now I was also wondering if there was a simple example of a variety that is not rational. Sadly I didn't find that much online, is it maybe hard to find them?
2026-03-26 13:44:14.1774532654
Is there an easy example of a variety that is not rational? ${}$
262 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in AFFINE-VARIETIES
- Finitely generated $k-$algebras of regular functions on an algebraic variety
- Is every open affine subscheme of an algebraic $k-$variety an affine $k-$variety?
- Let $f(x, y) = y^2 - g(x) \in \mathbb{R}[x, y]$. Show that $(0, 0)$ is a singular point if and only if $g(x) = x^2(x-a)$.
- Show that the ideal $(XY+XZ+YZ,XYZ) = (X,Y)(Y,Z)(X,Z)$ and the irreducibility of the vanishing sets of the factors.
- The 1-affine space is not isomorphic to the 1-affine space minus one point
- Proving $\mathcal V(\mathcal I(A)) =A$ and $\mathcal I(\mathcal V(B))= \sqrt{B} $
- Connectedness and path connectedness, of irreducible affine algebraic set in $\mathbb C^n$, under usual Euclidean topology
- Is the complement of a complex affine algebraic set in an irreducible complex affine algebraic set (path) connected in the euclidean topology?
- Does an irreducible real affine algebraic set/ its complement has finitely many connected components in the Euclidean topology?
- On the radical of an ideal in the polynomial ring in 4 variables over complex field
Related Questions in BIRATIONAL-GEOMETRY
- Some problems related to unirational varieties
- Shafarevich's problem 1.7, showing the existence of a rational function.
- Compute multiplicity by intersections
- Why is the torsion subgroup of the Neron Severi group a birational invariant?
- Contraction of blow up of $\mathbf{P}^n$ at a linear subspace
- Toric surfaces among rational surfaces
- Small contractions as blow ups
- Computing $R^1f_*\mathcal{O}_\hat{X}(\pm E)$ for blow-up of $\mathbb{A}^2_k$ at the origin
- Strict transforms after blowing up "complicated" ideals
- Blow up of one point is isomorphic to $\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{O} \oplus \mathcal{O}(1))$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
HINT:
You can check that in char $\ne 3$ the curve $x^3 + y^3 = 1$ is not rational.
$\bf{Added:}$
By a sign change, reduce to $x^3 + y^3 + 1 = 0$ (easier to deal with). Now, assume that we have a rational parametrization $(x,y) = (\frac{P(t)}{R(t)}, \frac{Q(t)}{R(t)})$, with $P$, $Q$, $R$ polynomials. We get $$P^3(t) + Q^3(t) + R^3(t) = 0$$
Assume that $\operatorname{gcd}(P, Q, R) = 1$, otherwise divide by the common divisor. Now, since the parametrization is non-trivial, at least one of the $P$, $Q$, $R$ is non-constant. Take the derivative in the equality above and get $$3 P'(t) P^2(t) + 3 Q'(t) Q^2(t) + 3 R'(t) R^2(t) = 0$$
Since the char is $\ne 3$, we may divide by $3$. Now we get two linear equations in the vector $(P^2(t), Q^2(t), R^2(t))$. It follows that this vector is proportional to $$(P(t), Q(t), R(t)) \times (P'(t), Q'(t), R'(t))$$ Note that this above vector is $\ne 0$, otherwise $P$, $Q$, $R$ have constant quotients, not possible. Also note that the vector $(P^2(t), Q^2(t), R^2(t))$ has relatively prime entries. It follows that $$M(t) \cdot (P^2(t), Q^2(t), R^2(t) ) = (P(t), Q(t), R(t)) \times (P'(t), Q'(t), R'(t))$$ where $M(t)$ is a polynomial. But now we have problems with the degree, since if $P(t)$ is then the polynomial of largest degree then $M(t) \cdot P^2(t) \not = Q(t) R'(t) - R(t) Q'(t)$, contradiction.
Note: This works for the curve $a x^n + b y^n +c = 0$, $a b c \ne 0$, $n\ge 3$, char $\not \mid n$.
$\bf{Added:}$ Let $A$ be a UFD ( in our case $k[t]$, where $k$ is the basic field), $K$ its field of fractions. Let $m\ge 2$ be a natural number, and consider $K^m$, $m$-size vectors with components in $K$ ( here $m=3$). Now, let $v \in A^m\subset K^m$, with the GCD of its entries $1$, and let $A^m \ni w = \alpha v$ proportional to $v$. Then $\alpha \in A$. (for us $v = (P^2, Q^2, R^2)$, $w = (P,Q,R) \times (P', Q', R')$ ).
Indeed, we have $w_i = \alpha v_i$ for all $i$. If $e_p(\alpha) < 0$ for some prime of $A$, and $i$ is one of the components for which $e_p(v_i) =0$ ( the components of $v$ are relatively prime ), we would get $e_p(w_i) < 0$, contradiction. Another proof (if the domain is PID, like $k[t]$) take $\sum c_i v_i = 1$, and so $\alpha = \alpha \cdot 1 = \alpha \cdot (\sum c_i v_i) = \sum c_i w_i \in A$.