Is there any way to define arithmetical multiplication as other thing than repeated addition? For example, how could you define $a\cdot b$ as other thing than $\underbrace{a+a+\cdots+a}_{b \text{-times}}$ or $\underbrace{b+b+\cdots+b}_{a \text{-times}}$?
Is there any way to define arithmetical multiplication as other thing than repeated addition?
2.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 10 best solutions below
On
$a\cdot b$ is the the value of $f_a(b)$, where $f_a$ is the unique endomorphism of $\mathbb N$ (under addition) satisfying $f_a(1)=a$.
On
Given two sets $A$ and $B$ of cardinality $a$ and $b$, respectively, the cardinality of the cartesian product $A\times B$ is called the product of $a$ and $b$, and is denoted by $a\cdot b$.
Update
When I wrote this answer I didn't have infinite sets in mind. I just wanted to convey a mental picture of multiplication that does not involve repeated addition.
On
Define set $S_n$ of multiples of $n$ as intersection of all sets $S\subseteq\Bbb N$ such that $0\in S,\forall m\in S:m+n\in S$. Define least common multiple of $a,b$ as the least positive element of $S_n\cap S_m$. Define $n^2$ as a number $n$ less than lcm of $n,n+1$. Define $a\cdot b$ as half of the number $(a+b)^2-a^2-b^2$.
On
The binary operation $\cdot$ is multiplicative if
- There exists an $x$ such that, for every $y$, $x\cdot y=y$. That is, there is a (left?) identity element.
- There exists an additive binary operation $+$ such that for every $x$, $y$, and $z$, $x\cdot(y+z)=x\cdot y+x\cdot z$. That is, $\cdot$ is (left?) distributive over $+$. This, of course, requires a definition of an additive operation.
This is related to the definition of a linear operator. This definition holds even for somewhat exotic definitions of multiplication, such as that for octonions (which is non-commutative and non-associative). It holds for ordinal numbers, cardinal numbers, vector spaces, projective spaces, the circle group, etc. These have interesting properties. Note that ordinal addition is itself non-commutative, for example, while the circle group possesses no zero element.
Come to think of it, where may one find examples of non-associative addition? Perhaps special relativity?
On
We can define $\mathbb{N}$ as the initial semiring. In this approach, not only do we not have to define multiplication as repeated addition, but, in fact, we do not have to define multiplication at all.
:)
On
If you want a definition of the usual operation of multiplication that does not reduce it to repeated addition, you can always define it axiomatically the same way that we were taught it:
- If $a, b$ are between 0 and 9, $a\cdot b$ is given by the multiplication table.
- Otherwise, the operation is defined recursively by specifying the rules of digit-by-digit multiplication, carry, and positive/negative sign. [I don't see the point of actually formulating the definitions here; I trust you get the idea.]
This wouldn't be particularly insightful, since the rules appear completely arbitrary; but it is well-defined and constructive. It is, after all, the system we learned and internalized as children.
On
Here is an answer that requires an $x$ and $y$ axis. Let us say that we would like to multiply $A$ and $B$. Then we locate the point, $(1,A)$ and make the line determined by $(0,0)$ and $(1,A)$. Then locate the point $(B,0)$, and draw the vertical line that goes through this point. Then find the intersection of the vertical line just formed and the line formed by connecting the origin and $(1,A)$. You get a point, $(B,C)$, and the point $C$ is equal to $AB$.

What I like about this definition is that it works with the real numbers, the fact that it is Euclidean in spirit, and that it makes clear that multiplication is (de)magnification.
On
$$a\times b = \begin{cases} \frac{a}{2} \times \left(2\times b\right) &\text{ if } a \text{ is even}\\ b +\frac{a-1}{2}\times\left(2\times b\right)& \text{ if } a \text{ is odd} \end{cases}$$
On
I like the definition of $ab$ as the area of a rectangle with side lengths $a$ and $b$. Then it's clear that multiplication is commutative, for example.
Incidentally, this can sometimes be useful in communicating with non-mathematicians. For example, you can say that a pile of stones has a prime number of stones in it if there's no way to arrange them into a rectangle apart from making a long line of stones. And Goldbach's conjecture becomes: "You have a pile containing an even number of stones. Is it possible to split it into two smaller piles such that there's no way of making a rectangle out of either of the smaller piles?"
Combining my comments into an answer:
First define $a^2=\sum_{i=1}^a (2i-1)$.
Then define $a\cdot b={(a+b)^2-a^2-b^2\over 2}$.
(You could of course argue that this is equivalent to repeated addition, but the same would be true of any valid definition.)