Let $ \Omega $ be a smooth bounded domain in $ \mathbb{R}^d $. Consider the functional problem $$ \min_{v\in H_0^1(\Omega)}\int_{\Omega}|\nabla v|^2dx. $$ It is easy to calculate the E-L equation of the problem above and obtain that the minimizer of such functional problem satisfies $ -\Delta v=0 $ weakly in $ \Omega $. For any $ u\in H_0^1(\Omega) $, since $ v $ is the minimizer, it follows that $$ \int_{\Omega}|\nabla v|^2dx\leq\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^2dx.\quad(*) $$ On the other hand, by testing the equation $ -\Delta v=0 $ with the function $ v-u $, we can deduce that $$ \int_{\Omega}\nabla v\cdot\nabla(v-u)dx=0. $$ In view of the inequality $ a\cdot (a-b)\geq \frac{1}{2}(|a|^2-|b|^2) $ for any $ a,b\in\mathbb{R}^n $, we can also obtain $(*)$. Here we have used two methods to obtain $(*)$. I want to ask is it a coincidence? Precisely speaking, for any inequality obtained from the E-L equation, if we can establish the same one by simply choose test function bu compare the value of the functional or not?
2026-03-26 16:10:25.1774541425
Is this a coincidece for harmonic equations.
79 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in ELLIPTIC-EQUATIONS
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Definition of constant coefficient elliptic operator
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Harmonic functions satisfying given inequality
- How to get the equation of an ellipse given the center, directrix and length of latus rectum?
- Regularity of the Divergence of Weak Solutions to Elliptic PDEs
- Showing that a function is harmonic
- Define a "Neumann" trace of a harmonic function on bounded domain
- How to determine if elliptic equation comes from variational problem?
- What is the parametric equation of a rotated Ellipse (given the angle of rotation)
Related Questions in LINEAR-PDE
- Solving the heat equation with robin boundary conditions
- The energy method for $u_{tt}-du_t-u_{xx}=0, (0,1)\times(0,T) $
- Motivation to define the boundary value
- 1-D Heat Equation, bounding difference in $\alpha$ given surface temperature
- Comparison principle for linear second order viscosity solutions
- Implications of weak convergence on the Lebesgue space to Sobolev space
- Geometric meaning of this PDE :$\left\{\begin{array}{lll} f_{t}+xf_{y}=0\\ f|_{t=0}=f_{0}(x,y) \end{array}\right.$
- Simple linear first order PDE
- how to solve a linear pde of changing evolution equation?
- How to solve a PDE with time dependent domain?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
To some small degree this is a rule, but obtaining some inequality which would do the step can be impossible or hard.
Instead of functionals, look at the three functions $x^2$, $x^4$ and $x^3- \cos x$. All of the them have (local) minimum at $0$. The first two are convex. For the first one we are able to do the trick. For the second it will be possible, but harder.
For the third one, the claim is not true (i.e., the minimum is only local), so the trick per se fails. But if one works harder, there still be something possible locally by inequalities. However it is easier to work with the second derivative.
Fourth function will be $x^3$: For this function, $x=0$ satisfies the E-L condition $3x^2=0$, but the trick fails because $0$ is not a minimum.
--
The original problem: You have $u$ and $v$, you have the line $L=u \{ v + t(u-v) \}$ containing the two points. Take the restriction of the functional to the line. Is not it a quadratic function? Should not it be easy to find an inequality showing that the minimum is a minimum?
Our functional is very quadratic. It equals $B(u,u)$ for a nice bilinear form (scalar product, actually).