I know almost nothing when it comes to graph theory.
I have this graph which i am told is not planar.
I know that for planar graphs no edge can cross another edge and that for planar graphs $v - e + r = 1$ where $v = |V|$ is the number of vertices, e = |E| is the number of edges and $r$ is the number of minimal enclosed regions.
My graph meets these criteria.
To show that it is not planar, if that is the case, should i try to find a graph that it is isomorphic to which is not planar?
Any ideas on how to do that?
This is my graph with an improved version on the right:

Yes, the above graph is planar, because it admits a plane drawing. A plane drawing is a drawing without edge-crossings much like yours above, and finding such a drawing is already a valid proof of planarity.
To show that some other graph is not planar, you could first check if it perhaps has too many edges (i.e. more than $3n-6$ if the graph has $n$ vertices) or, if this fails, you could look for a subdivision or a minor isomorphic to one of the graphs $K_{3,3}$ or $K_5$. Both latter statements are characteristic of non-planarity and hence the methods always work (at least in principle). You can look up details and definitions by googling Kuratowski's theorem.
Also, I'd be careful saying that $r$ is the number of minimally enclosed regions as this number would not quite be well-defined if the graph were drawn on the surface of a sphere (which is a perfectly fine equivalent definition of planarity) - it is safer to think of the infinite region as an extra region of the graph, in which case the polyhedral formula for connected planar graphs modifies to $v-e+r=2$.