We know isometry of euclidean spaces is composition of an orthogonal transformation and a translation. Also differential map of an isometry of regular surfaces is an orthogonal transformation.
I want to know that, is there any such composition or some expression for isometry of surfaces?
Thank you.
2026-03-24 21:59:41.1774389581
Isometry of surfaces
1.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in SURFACES
- Surface by revolution
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- 2D closed surface such that there's always a straight line to a point?
- parametrized surface are isometric if all corresponding curves have same length
- Klein bottle and torus in mod $p$ homology
- How can I prove that the restricted parametrization of a surface in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ ia a diffeomorphism?
- A diffeomorphism between a cylinder and a one-sheeted hyperboloid
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
Related Questions in CURVES
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- The problem in my proof that if $\beta(s)=\alpha(-s)$ then the torsions of the curves satisfies $\tau_{\beta}(s)=-\tau_{\alpha}(-s)$
- Given a circle, can i assume that the point where all the normals went thought and the point where all the tangents are equidistants are the same?
- Function determining temperature of points along a curve (find local maxima temp & local minima temp)
- Reference for $L$-functions of curves
- About the Green's Theorem
- inhomogeneous coordinates to homogeneous coordinates
- Can the relocation of one control point of a NURBS curve be compensated by an adjustment of some weights?
- $\| \gamma'(t) \|$ = constant for all $t$, if and only if $\gamma''(t)$ is normal to the tangent vector space for all $t$.
- proving that a curve with constant curvature contained in a sphere its a circle
Related Questions in ISOMETRY
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- How does it follow that $A^T A = I$ from $m_{ij}m_{ik}=\delta _{jk}$?
- Drawing the image of a circle under reflection through its center?
- Isometry maps closed unit ball to closed unit balI
- Rotate around a specific point instead of 0,0,0
- Minimal displacement for isometries composition
- Proving that two curves in $\mathbb{R^3}$ with the same binormal vector are congruent
- Dimension of real inner product with unitary transformation
- Isometry and Orthogonal Decomposition
- Can an orthogonal matrix preserve $\ell_p$-norm on a subspace?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There is no particular form of the map $u$, no. First of all, consider an isometry from the $xy$-plane to itself, one that fixes the plane. Then $u$ has the form $$ u(x, y, 0) = (x, y, 0) $$ for any $x, y$. But off the plane, it can be almost anything. Letting $f$ be any (continuous) function of $x, y, z$, we can write something that's the "same" as $u$ (from the point of view of isometry) but looks rather different: $$ v(x, y, z) = (x, y, z f(x, y, z)) $$ Indeed, we could write $$ v(x, y, z) = (x, y, 0) + z(f(x, y, z), g(x, y, z), h(x, y, z)) $$ and still have an isometry, as long as $f, g, h$ are continuous functions.
Of course, all this depends on $u$ being "messy" away from the surface $F$. Another possibility is that on the surface $F$ itself, the function must be "nice", but even that is pretty much hopeless. For once again letting $F$ be the $xy$-plane, we can write
$$ u(x, y, z) = (x, y, zk(z) + h(x)) $$ where $k$ and $h$ are any continuous functions, and get an isometry (indeed, a special isometry that's the identity on the surface $F$).
In short: isometry, for surfaces in 3-space, just isn't very "rigid".
If you require that the surfaces be compact surfaces without boundary, you might find some more rigidity, but even then I have my doubts, for if your compact surface happens to have a 'flat region' (some open disk that lies entirely in a plane), then within this flat region, you can do the tricks that I did with the plane above.
Maybe for compact surfaces with everywhere (or almost-everywhere) nonzero gaussian curvature, there's a rigidity theorem -- I suspect there is, but cannot recall it -- but in general, things can be pretty ugly.