The proof in Proof Wiki states that the proofs for "empty mapping is mapping" and "mappings between sets of same cardinality are equivalent" imply that $\emptyset\in A$.
Why is that? Can somebody give me an explanation for this, please?
The proof in Proof Wiki states that the proofs for "empty mapping is mapping" and "mappings between sets of same cardinality are equivalent" imply that $\emptyset\in A$.
Why is that? Can somebody give me an explanation for this, please?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
$A$ is the set of all $n\in\Bbb N$ such that if $S$ is any set of cardinality $n$, and $\preceq$ is any total order on $S$, then there is exactly one isomorphism from $\langle S,\preceq\rangle$ to $\langle\Bbb N_n,\le\rangle$. We want to show that $\varnothing\in A$.
The only set $S$ of cardinality $0$ is $\varnothing$, and the result Empty Mapping Is Mapping says that $\varnothing$ is a mapping from $\varnothing$ to any set. In particular, it’s a mapping from $\varnothing$ to $\Bbb N_0$. In the notation used in your source $\Bbb N_0$ is the set of natural numbers less than $0$, so $\Bbb N_0=\varnothing$: $\varnothing$ is a mapping from $\varnothing$ to $\varnothing$.
This mapping is surjective: $\forall x\in\Bbb N_0\,\exists y\in\varnothing(\langle y,x\rangle\in\varnothing)$ is vacuously true simply because there is no $x\in\Bbb N_0$. The result Equivalence of Mappings between Sets of Same Cardinality then says that this mapping is bijective, since its domain $\varnothing$ and range $\Bbb N_0$ are clearly of the same cardinality: they’re even the same set.
We now have a bijection from $\varnothing$ to $\Bbb N_0$, namely, the mapping $\varnothing$. It is vacuously order-preserving: the only total order on $\varnothing$ is $\varnothing$, which is also the only total order on $\Bbb N_0$, and since $\varnothing$ has no members, there’s simply nothing to check. Thus, the map $\varnothing$ is an order-isomorphism from $\langle\varnothing,\varnothing\rangle$ to $\langle\Bbb N_0,\le\rangle$ (where in this case $\le$ turns out to be just $\varnothing$).
Finally, any order-isomorphism from $\langle\varnothing,\varnothing\rangle$ to $\langle\Bbb N_0,\le\rangle$ is a subset of $\varnothing\times\Bbb N_0$, and $\varnothing$ is the only subset of $\varnothing\times\Bbb N_0$, so $\varnothing$ must be the only order-isomorphism from $\langle\varnothing,\varnothing\rangle$ to $\langle\Bbb N_0,\le\rangle$. This shows that the map $\varnothing$ satisfies the requirements for membership in $A$.