Let’s assume $\epsilon$ is a topos and j is a Lawvere-Tierney topology in $\epsilon$. Now, let $Sh_j(\epsilon)$ be the full subcategory of $\epsilon$ on the sheaves for j. Now, let $i:Sh_j(\epsilon)\longrightarrow \epsilon$ be the embedding functor and let $L:\epsilon\longrightarrow Sh_j(\epsilon)$ be the sheafification functor. Then, $L\dashv i$. $Sh_j(\epsilon)$ is a topos and let $\Omega_j$ be its subobject classifier and $1_j$ be its terminal object. Now, let $m:X\longrightarrow Y$ be a j-closed monomorphism. How can we show that there exists a unique morphism $\phi:Y\longrightarrow \Omega_j$ which makes the square with vertices X,Y, $i(1_j)$ and $i(\Omega_j)$ a pullback.
2026-03-28 22:31:09.1774737069
j-closed monomorphisms in a topos with a Lawvere-Tierney topology j
76 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in SHEAF-THEORY
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Question about notation for Čech cohomology and direct image of sheaves in Hartshorne
- Does sheafification preserve surjectivity?
- Image of a morphism of chain complexes of sheaves via direct/inverse image functor
- Tensor of a $k[X]$ module with the structure sheaf of an affine variety is a sheaf
- Sheafy definition for the tangent space at a point on a manifold?
- Whats the relationship between a presheaf and its sheafification?
- First isomorphism theorem of sheaves -- do you need to sheafify if the map is surjective on basis sets?
- An irreducible topological space $X$ admits a constant sheaf iff it is indiscrete.
- Why does a globally generated invertible sheaf admit a global section not vanishing on any irreducible component?
Related Questions in TOPOS-THEORY
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
- Prove that a "tensor product" principal $G$-bundle coincides with a "pullback" via topos morphism
- (From Awodey) Find the subobject classifier for $\sf Sets^{P}$ for a poset $\sf P$
- Cardinal collapse and (higher) toposes
- Geometric interpretation of Lawvere-Tierney topology
- Can 2 different coverages *on the same category* yield the same sheaf topos?
- Is there a classifying topos for schemes?
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- Classifying topos of a topological group
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I will work entirely in the topos $\epsilon$. Since $i$ preserves limits we have that $i(1_j)$ is just the terminal object in $\epsilon$.
The object $\Omega_j$ can be found as a subobject of $\Omega$ via the equalizer: $$ \Omega_j \xrightarrow{\omega_j} \Omega \overset{j}{\underset{Id}{\rightrightarrows}} \Omega $$ See for example Sheaves in Geometry and Logic by Mac Lane and Moerdijk ((7) on page 224).
Let $\chi: Y \to \Omega$ classify $m: X \to Y$. Since $m$ is closed we have $jm = m$. So by the universal property of the equalizer, there is $\phi: Y \to \Omega_j$ such that $\omega_j \phi = \chi$. I claim that this $\phi$ is the $\phi$ you asked for.
Since $t: 1 \to \Omega$ satisfies $jt = t$, we can again use the universal property of the equalizer to find $t_j: 1 \to \Omega_j$ such that $\omega_j t_j = t$.
We can thus form the following commuting diagram. $\require{AMScd}$ \begin{CD} X @>>> 1 @= 1\\ @V m VV @V t_j VV @VVtV\\ Y @>> \phi > \Omega_j @>> \omega_j > \Omega \end{CD} Because $\chi$ classifies $m$ and the bottom arrow is just $\chi$, the outer rectangle is a pullback.
To see that the left square is a pullback, we check the universal property. Let $f: Z \to Y$ and $g: Z \to 1$ be such that $\phi f = t_j g$. Then $\omega_j \phi f = \omega_j t_j g = t g$. So there is unique $u: Z \to X$ making everything commute.
We are left to show that $\phi$ is unique. Suppose that we have $\psi: Y \to \Omega_j$ such that the left square below is a pullback: \begin{CD} X @>>> 1 @= 1\\ @V m VV @V t_j VV @VVtV\\ Y @>> \psi > \Omega_j @>> \omega_j > \Omega \end{CD} Then the outer rectangle is also a pullback. To see this let $f: Z \to Y$ and $g: Z \to 1$ be such that $\omega_j \psi f = t g$. Then since $t g = \omega_j t_j g$ and $\omega_j$ is mono, we have $\psi f = t_j g$. We assumed that the left square is a pullback, so there we find the required unique arrow $Z \to X$. Since the outer square is a pullback we have that $\omega_j \psi$ classifies $m$. Since classifiers are unique, we have $\omega_j \psi = \chi = \omega_j \phi$. Then by how we constructed $\phi$ from the equalizer, we conclude that $\psi = \phi$.